So you're saying that his records are fabricated?
Onus of proof is on the guy making the claim.
can he prove his records are real?
or else we're entering the realms of "PROVE IT WASN'T MISSILES THAT TOOK DOWN THE TWIN TOWERS" and we all know how that ends...
or else we're entering the realms of "PROVE IT WASN'T MISSILES THAT TOOK DOWN THE TWIN TOWERS" and we all know how that ends...
Actually, one could argue that you're the conspiracy theorist here. No other 'figure of authority' seems to have commented on it, so you're subscribing to the theory that the highest authority on the matter is lying to you![]()
a conspiracy requires more than one person
I'm saying a man who has made extraordinary claims with no evidence needs to put up or shut up, especially given his record of spouting ********.
I'm sure there are plenty of conspiraloons out there with evidence of aliens, footage of shape shudders and all sorts of data re: the twin towers that they believe should be investigated.
Do you really want the treasury to phone up Greenspan at home and say 'erm sorry we've got this crazy guy in our unelected upper house and he's claiming...'
You'd rather believe something with no evidence?
Believe what exactly?
Believe that he's lying to you. It's a belief either way, because the small amount of effort that it would take to prove anything hasn't been taken. That's all i'm saying.
They've been very, very noughty.
I'm disappointed that nobody got my second post pun.![]()