.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kol
  • Start date Start date
As Deadly Ferret says, they claim it from his estate, which means that my mum has to pay for it.

Fortunately I'm here to help her though.

Only as long as the estate was worth £19k or more.
Did your father leave your mother £19k+ in cash and/or assets?
Don't include any insurance schemes in this figure as they are paid to the next of kin and do not make upp part of your father's estate.
 
I know for a fact that if they tried that on me I'd make them jump through every legal hoop possible! They made the mistake, not your Mother! Screw it, it wasn't even a mistake that involved her, it was something that occurred against your late step-Dad!

Surely there's some legal recourse she can take. 19K seems a bit rich considering the error wasn't even yours/hers!

It's a tax issue and when it comes to the ability to claim back money Inland Revenue is about as high up the chain as it comes.
So firstly - there is no telling them to "Screw It".
Secondly they are the law with regards tax.

His mother is not being asked to pay the money, it is coming from his late father's estate - this is entirely different.
If his father had £19k+ in money and assets which were passed to his mother then this is where the money is coming from - not his mother.
If his father didn't have that much then they can only claim back from the value of his estate.
When somebody dies all of their money and assets make up "an estate".
Then all of that person's creditors come forward and make a claim.
If the estate is big enough to cover all the debts then fine - all debts are paid and anything left over is given out as per the deceased's will or to the next of kin.
If the estate isn't big enough to cover all the debts then you either need to negotiate with his creditors or employ a solicitor to do so for you.
Once the estate is all used up the next of kin cannot be asked to pay any of the deceased's debts.

Anyway, the only thing I question here is the date.
They cannot claim back tax from that long ago.
Basically if you think they have messed up you have up to 5 years to claim.
If they think they messed up they have up to 7 years.
So if this is back from 1983 they cannot claim it all back.
Basically they can only claim back pay for 7 years prior to when you received notification.
So even right now they can only charge his estate back-tax to 2000.
 
That's not too bad, my mum has recently had to foot a bill for over 19K's worth of income tax for my late step-father, turns out they had "forgotten" to take it off his pay when he got promoted - back in 1983

My main thought here is that the provision to reclaim the money falls under the Limitations Act and as such if they have never tried between 1983 and now to pursue the funds they can go whistle.
 
The morale of story - never use Direct Debit to pay any bills!

Once they taken your money, it'll be hard to get your money back and even if you did, it would take a long time for them to return your money!

Edit: Like nydryl said- Pay as you go is the way forward, you don't pay VAT for it and no nasty surprises!
 
Like I said, £60 at best, not £383! Apparently there were 15hours of calls to her. I don't think this was the case, but I'll see when it comes through.

When you've received your itemised bill, if you do have any concerns with it, if you use the Online Contact Form to send us an email (putting FIT135 anywhere in the body of the text), either myself or one of my colleagues will be happy to try and resolve it for you.

Faza20
Vodafone UK
 
When you've received your itemised bill, if you do have any concerns with it, if you use the Online Contact Form to send us an email (putting FIT135 anywhere in the body of the text), either myself or one of my colleagues will be happy to try and resolve it for you.

Faza20
Vodafone UK

Cheers Faza ;)
 
Faza, it appears vodafone have yet again screwed up! So I've taken your advice. If you get a message (just sent) about an incorrect bill and it ending with yet another incorrect bill, then I hope you can do better than the rest I've dealt with.
 
Who actually thinks it sensible to let these companies into your account to take what they like? Why don't you not pay them until they send you a bill. Then in a situation like this you can dispute it, without being out of pocket in the meantime??
 
Who actually thinks it sensible to let these companies into your account to take what they like? Why don't you not pay them until they send you a bill. Then in a situation like this you can dispute it, without being out of pocket in the meantime??

In most cases it's probably because paying by DD is cheaper than getting an itemised bill.
 
Faza, it appears vodafone have yet again screwed up! So I've taken your advice. If you get a message (just sent) about an incorrect bill and it ending with yet another incorrect bill, then I hope you can do better than the rest I've dealt with.

Last Activity: 19th Oct 2007 04:37 PM
 
Like I said, £60 at best, not £383! Apparently there were 15hours of calls to her. I don't think this was the case, but I'll see when it comes through.

i am going through the same with vidaphone at the moment. i have refused to pay it untill i have been shown how i have managed to go over my 'Unlimited Text' package. with extra texts.

apparently i sent text whilst in Norway. funny thing being i have never been tehre!
 
Back
Top Bottom