Associate
Quite possibly, i though you meant the architecture. Think the 661 is a 65nm chip with VT
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Jokester said:There was a benchmark review over Anandtech, that included a FEAR benchmark. The Conroe was about 20% quicker than a FX-62 equivalent.
Jokester
Cyber-Mav said:you think thats bad, the recent hardocp review pits a 7800gtx up against a x1900xt. and guess which card is the winner in that round.
what is it with reviewers these days? they all seem to be taking bribes or something.
3DMark05: 13588 3DMarksCPU: Intel 2.13Ghz 4MB L2 "Conroe" ES (dual core) @ 8 x 333Mhz = 2.66Ghz stock volts (~1.15v real)
CPU Cooling: stock Intel aircooling aluminum heatsink
DDR2: Mushkin PC-4200 @ 3-2-2-8 (~2.2v) - 2x512MB
Video: ATI X1900XTX @ 720/828 (stock aircooling)
MB: Intel D975XBX "Bad Axe" stock w/BIOS 0807
OS: Windows XP Pro SP2 (absolutely NO tweaks)
Dolph said:So is this, see you soon.
not everybody... i have nothing against intels chips, i just think there an evil immoral company with no standards beyond those that allow for a greater bottom lineihatelag said:Hehe, everybody wants a Conroe it seems...
locutus12 said:not everybody... i have nothing against intels chips, i just think there an evil immoral company with no standards beyond those that allow for a greater bottom line
locutus12 said:not everybody... i have nothing against intels chips, i just think there an evil immoral company with no standards beyond those that allow for a greater bottom line
Durzel said:Some more meaningful results here: