2 2600xt ddr4 version in crossfire results

[gareth170]

Anything.

Fear, sup com, fsx, q4, d3, vegas etc.

how do i benchmark Quake 4?

 

[jaykay]

Use fraps and click the tab for FPS.
Then tick the boxes for minmax/avg. Then press f11 when in the game.

 

[gareth170]

Use fraps and click the tab for FPS.
Then tick the boxes for minmax/avg. Then press f11 when in the game.

ok. i guess fraps is a program right? if so where do i get it from?

 

[SS-89]

http://www.fraps.com/

google is your friend.

 

[gareth170]

http://www.fraps.com/

google is your friend.

yahoo is my friend..

 

[jrodga2k5]

so what program are you using to clock the card then? Also still using the 8.40 set of drivers?

Oh an update on my score

3DMark Score 5168 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 1821 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 2216 Marks
CPU Score 2393 Marks

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2655071

Only 845Mhz core and 850mem

 

[gareth170]

so what program are you using to clock the card then? Also still using the 8.40 set of drivers?

Oh an update on my score

3DMark Score 5168 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 1821 Marks
SM 3.0 Score 2216 Marks
CPU Score 2393 Marks

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=2655071

Only 845Mhz core and 850mem

i uesd AMD gpu clock tool.. yes im still using 7.8 beta (8.40) drivers...

 

[mrk]

edit*

Saw you updated to Vista with better score

 

[gareth170]

edit*

Saw you updated to Vista with better score

who?

 

[mrk]

who?

You do the who do voodoo?

What is the score btw in single card mode ? on my x2 with 8800gts 320mb I get over 130fps using the exact same settings btw - would be interesting to see what yours is single gpu mode.

 

[gareth170]

single card mode, vista, 1680 x 1050res, max settings, with 4x AA and 16x AF:

in xp it was 45.52fps

 

[mrk]

An interesting comparison - we have the exact same cpu at stock and are getting this humongous FPS difference - I wonder what I would get if I got a 9800 card come September time! certainly shows that at higher res with FSAA it all goes down to the GFX card on modern games as long as the cpu is half decent to begin with.

It's all looking good for Crysis methinks

 

[gareth170]

An interesting comparison - we have the exact same cpu at stock and are getting this humongous FPS difference - I wonder what I would get if I got a 9800 card come September time! certainly shows that at higher res with FSAA it all goes down to the GFX card on modern games as long as the cpu is half decent to begin with.

It's all looking good for Crysis methinks

what results u get? are u on vista or xp?

 

[mrk]

what results u get? are u on vista or xp?

Using these settings:

I get this:

Spec is:

4200+ stock (skt 939)
2gb xms platinum ddr400
8800gts 320mb stock
xfi gamer

Edit*

Looks like I used 16x FSAA instead fo 4x making the different so huge it makes Jesus cry?

 

[gareth170]

im confused now.

why is that when using AA in css vista is faster than xp but when using no AA in css xp is faster than vista?

am i going crazy or something...

 

[mrk]

im confused now.

why is that when using AA in css vista is faster than xp but when using no AA in css xp is faster than vista?

am i going crazy or something...

I get better results in Vista too, I used to get 84~fps with 4xFSAA in XP but on Vista it's over 130fps.

I think the Vista drivers are much better really.

 

[gareth170]

I get better results in Vista too, I used to get 84~fps with 4xFSAA in XP but on Vista it's over 130fps.

I think the Vista drivers are much better really.

but why when using no AA in css, xp is faster than vista?

 

[lay-z-boy]

Still no results apart from css?


bah! is that all you play or something?

 

[gareth170]

Still no results apart from css?


bah! is that all you play or something?

im doing quake 4 now

 

[gareth170]

vista, max settings, 1280x1024 :

2007-08-05 20:23:05 - Quake4
Frames: 7724 - Time: 130667ms - Avg: 60.641 - Min: 49 - Max: 65

xp, max settings, 1280x1024 :

2007-08-05 20:45:43 - Quake4
Frames: 10352 - Time: 180000ms - Avg: 57.511 - Min: 0 - Max: 63