2.5" vs 3.5"

thanks for that, an interesting read :)
at the moment i have 2 500GBs in raid for my OS, a 1TB for films, 500GB for music and 500GB for software installation files. my case has a bracket that allows me to mount 2x2.5" drives by the psu, so thought about maybe using a 500GB drive (never going to need 1TB) for my OS and programs. this should then allow better airflow from the front fan through the case and maybe cut down a bit on noise and power usage.
have to check if any of my 2.5" drives arent 5400rpm as i guess that will slow things down quite abit?
 
Indeed just watch out that you don't end up with a 5400RPM version if your using it as a boot disk. The Western Digital Scorpio Black seems a good drive (and it's 7200RPM too).
 
just run it on the drive in my laptop and got :
Transfer rate:
Min 25.6MB/sec
Max 77.5MB/sec
Average 58.0MB/sec

Access time :
18.8ms

Burst Rate
100.2 MB/sec

CPU usage -1.0%

im guessing this is slow? it is indeed a 5400rpm drive, so is the one i have in my enclosure with me, will look when i get home but guess all will be similar :(
 
Yeah you probably don't want to use a 5400RPM model as a boot disk although it would work ok I guess. If all your 2.5" drives are 5400RPM (and chances are they will be) then I would have a look at the WD Scorpio Black.
 
if im going to be spending money though, an SSD would be the way to go :( was hoping i could recylce what i had. would 2x500GB 5400rpms in raid be similar speeds to a single 7200rpm drive?
would i notice a huge difference in the speed going down in rpm?
i spose only thing to do is run the same test on the current hdds in the desktop and see what speeds it gives and compare.
does it affect the results a lot bearing in mind im doing the tests on a drive that is running windows?
 
from a previous thread of mine i found this is what i get on my raid0 and standard 3.5" drive :

raid0
raid.png


3.5"
1TB.png


and this is what my 2.5" drive got :

25.png


so there will be quite a speed decrease :(

but how about in raid? or will the fact they are slower drives just not make it worth the effort?
 
I would have thought the fact they are 5400RPM drives would mean putting them in RAID would provide very limited benefit.

ok thats kool. in the real world, how much would it affect the overall speed of the computer? to be honest i dont really notice and real difference in load up times from my laptop and desktop. or are there other factors to look at?
 
ok, reading a few other forums via google, my WD 500GB 5400rpm drive outperforms some of the 320GB 7200rpm 2.5" drives. now im proper confused.
 
right, now after reading about my WD5000BEVT i decided to bench that, and thats just made me even more confused, can someone please explain what the results mean?

1TB standard 3.5"
1TB.png
vs WD5000BEVT
WD500GB.png


so from that, my 5400rpm drive have some speeds very similar to my 7200rpm 1TB 3.5" drive :confused:
 
this is the inside of my case :

P6120057.jpg


so im thinking if an OS isnt suited for a 5400rpm drive, maybe move my 500GB 3.5" 7200rpm music drive to a 500GB 2.5" 5400rpm drive. then as only 200GB or so is used up of my 2x500GB raid drives, ditch raid and go down to 1x500GB for my OS. this would then mean 2 HDDs can be removed. therefore increasing airflow? or would it not make a huge difference?
then when funds allow, add an SSD in with the 2.5" hdd and use the 500GB new os drive for installing games/apps to. does this sound like a good swap around or will it be a lot of hassel for little gains?
 
moved the drives around (temps for mobo dropped by 3-4c and temps for cpu dropped 2-3c). im thinking maybe i could do with a new front fan as putting your hand by it you can barely feel any air.
 
Back
Top Bottom