Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 4,171
- Location
- Norwich
has any green feature made a fast car faster or lighter ?
Is there an E90 M3 CSL in the pipeline?
Cosmetic changes on this really don't do it for me either.
Dumbo anyone?
P
The system will not turn the engine off if the battery charge is low, or the desired climate temperature hasn't been met, there's condensation on the windscreen etc.With this stop start thing I guess it must start the car up again using the starter motor ?? Surely this puts a huge strain on the battery constantly stop starting all the time ?
The system will not turn the engine off if the battery charge is low, or the desired climate temperature hasn't been met, there's condensation on the windscreen etc.
Additionally, brake energy regeneration utilises the kinetic energy of the car to charge and power the electrical system.
BMW say they use absorptive glass mat batteries, if that means anything to youIts just I was thinking on a technical level (sad I know but its because Im an engineer) the car must need a pretty hefty battery to take the beating that continuous stop starts whilst keeping everything electrical running constantly would give it.
has any green feature made a fast car faster or lighter ?
has any green feature made a fast car faster or lighter ?
BMW say they use absorptive glass mat batteries, if that means anything to you
From what I can read they are battery better suited to the sort of load/charge cycle that a start-stop system may place on it, and also the starter motor is designed specifically for start stop systems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absorptive_glass_mat
Looking to the diesels - the fact that the new 320ED will sit on the motorway at 75mph getting about 75mpg is an absolutely incredible technical achievement !
I think short of some revolutionary invention or change of direction, there isn't going to be any huge steps with regards to economy, but rather a continuation of the "baby steps" we have been making already. If you stand back and think... we now have a 4.0 V8 BMW M3 with 420 HP, capable of 190 MPH, returning 25 MPG. That's quite impressive.It's "OK".
Hardly a huge step forward.
It's "OK".
Hardly a huge step forward.
I saw that mentioned in an article, is that appearing in the real world?
Fair enough. Still can't see the point.[TW]Fox;15956854 said:It's not meant to be though, its simply a mid-life refresh of the existing car![]()
Fair enough. Still can't see the point.
[TW]Fox;15956857 said:In my experience of 4 different 2009 ED models, no![]()
I have only driven about 7 days in total with this feature and really couldn't get used to it
Was reading a mag recently and they tested a car with and without it and the fuel consumption was worse with it on