2012

Is it me or does the last 45mins felt like they ran out of budget, dodgy camera works and pretty poor studio setup (when in ship e.t.c.)?



There's something very odd about the camera work in the water scenes. Were they shot on high-res video rather than film? The whole look of those sections is different to everything else.

And yes, it's an embarrassingly stupid film. It's not just the science (which is pretty much always nonsense in disaster films) but the succession of trite cliches that make up the plot. Most were so obvious you could spot them five minutes ahead of schedule.


M
 
I watched this tonight. I agree with the majority of the thread. It was **** but entertaining ****.

Another point which I must say that hasn't been mentioned... when the plane is taking off with the ground crumbling below them, surely the suction of the air would suck the plane down aswell, or at least have some major effect to the stability of the aircraft.

Maybe i'm thinking too much into it. Something which you SHOULDN'T do when watching this movie.
 
Excellent idea, but so easy to work out.

FIRST time is the only time needed to get to the end.

If you are a blonde then you will not like this film.
 
Bringing up from the dead....

Oh.My.God... I just watched this on DVD after my sister reckoned it was really good. Half way in my mum and had our mouthes open in disgust. We're not snobs when it comes to films but god...

Having said that it wasn't terrible, just too far fetched to even take remotely seriously. The Day After Tomorrow was pretty good and, although there were a couple of big "wtf" moments most of it was reasonably believable (if slowed down). 2012? Anyone that has any knowledge in Geology and Earth science will be crying:

Random massive cracks that deep?
Plates sliding into the ocean? How?! What?! Yet the only way that could possibly happen in our wildest dreams would include masses of magma and ash/eruptions!
A supervolcano erupting with a littl bit of smoke and some lava bombs? Obviously the biggest Volcano in existance today would do that... And obviously you can outrun a 700mph pyroclastic flow in an old camper van.. (at least that is consistent with other films though...)
Tsunamis that can hit Washington and get into the Himalayas?! Must have emptied the entire ocean!
Cruise ships miles out to sea being swept away by giant waves?!
All of this apparently settling down in a few weeks?

That's just for starters...

Also who's idea was it to build a load of super ships in the Himalayas? Because steering ships like that through mountain peaks, before the water dropped, whilst in massive currents is a good idea?:confused:
Obiously you spend tens of Billians on ships and you equip them with what I can only assume is second world war oil/coal engines? Obviously nuclear was to expensive.:p
Why, when flying up did the small aircraft always end up below most of the city and in canyons?:confused:

And breathe...:p

Yep that water would have been well below zero, no way he could have remained underwater for that length of time without turning blue!

Why? It would probably have been warm. It was supposed to have come from the Indian Ocean a couple of hours previously so wouldn't have lost much heat (Although that would depend on how much of it was surface water, which should have been most). That's about the most realistic part in the entire film.:D

Is it me or does the last 45mins felt like they ran out of budget, dodgy camera works and pretty poor studio setup (when in ship e.t.c.)?


I thought that too, looked like scenes from "the making of", like they hadn't put any processing over it. It reminded me of rides at a theme park.

Anyway having said that I probably will watch it again, when I want something brainless. Still 5/10.
 
I watched this last night and thought it was absolutely terrible, I want my 3 hours back. It may not have been that long but it lboody felt like it :(
 
I watched this last night and thought it was absolutely terrible, I want my 3 hours back. It may not have been that long but it lboody felt like it :(

I watched this at work on Sunday. Even though I was paid to watch it I still felt like I was robbed. The only saving grace for me is I didn't waste my own time watching it.

Most of what I thought was bad about it has already been covered but If I'm to die tragically helping save thousands of people, I hope my wife takes a little bit longer to get over my death than the kids mother :D
 
Having said that it wasn't terrible, just too far fetched to even take remotely seriously. The Day After Tomorrow was pretty good and, although there were a couple of big "wtf" moments most of it was reasonably believable (if slowed down). 2012? Anyone that has any knowledge in Geology and Earth science will be crying

I watched this again last night on Blu-ray and one of the extras is a short documentary on the scientific basis of what is portrayed in the film - 'Earth displacement theory' as anyone with any knowledge in Geology and Earth science would know. ;):D

The effects are amazing esp in 1080p but the story was essentially meant to be a modern retelling of Noah's Ark which is why its so ridiculous.
 
Ah! Yeah, that theory, made up by a history professor based partly on continental drift (which has been widely discredited/superceded...) and at odds with almost every piece of geological evidence (although asthenospheric slip may be partly possible). :p

Still doesn't explain why the plate fragments were sliding into the ocean! :D
 
I think it covers that in the documentary too - cant remember what though. Sounded convincing. :D

Hmmm....:p

People have been talking about the whole of LA sliding into the ocean just like in the movie since i was a little kid

There is sliding into the ocean in real life and there is what happened in that film! I think the suggestion is that due to most of LA not technically being attached to the main American plate (the san andreas fault is the plate boundary) it could end up "sliding" into the sea, or in real life sinking due to earthquakes, not breaking up and falling vertically down like the film.:p
 
I was confused while watching this, were they honestly trying to make a serious or even semi-serious film because its impossible to take any of it serious? especially with John Cusack, so i ended up switching off and just enjoying it for what it was, a silly end of world film with expensive high quality special effects.
 
I also liked the mobile phone network coverage. Half the world is falling into the sea yet the last thing to fail was the tv's and mobile phones.

Yet I struggle to get a signal in some villages in cambridge :D
 
Back
Top Bottom