- Joined
- 2 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 4,298
- Location
- Oxfordshire
Think I'm running 125% on Windows and "3360x1890" (one smaller than native 4k) on Mac...which is basically 125%
Thanks for infoI'm glad I went 32" in the end. From both a work and gaming perspective![]()
272URX is 600 right now I believe on HUKD I think I saw the deal if that's of interest to youThanks for info, this setup is for a second system I have.
Heads says go 32", wallet after buying another GPU is saying perhaps go 27" 4K for time being and perhaps later go 32", as also debating if going curved now is something I wanna try, was thinking 1500R / 1800R.
Based on monitors I was looking at, it's about £28 difference going 27" 1440P to say 4K version of it, then if I go 32" 4K it's a £141 jump, this is all standard flat, not priced up curved yet. Still just looking around.
May just have to go look at screens in a physical store.
PG27UCDM is slightly better because of the higher pixel density but yeah, the triangle pixel layout for QD-OLED can make text look particularly odd. I had a go on one of the new RG(W)B WOLED panels and that seems almost as good as IPS now which is great to finally see.I wouldn't recommend the PG32UCDM to a coder. I switched to this monitor from a 4K 32" IPS and the text clarity is WAY worse. I have to scale it up at least 120% to clear it up. I'm guessing the PG27UCDM is the same. I think it's a native issue with QD-Oled.