2p tax on petrol.....again

Obviously we aren't paying enough in taxes, otherwise they wouldn't put it up. Clearly in a recession the government needs to more money. 2p increase is perfectly reasonable in my opinion.


And how does putting fuel prices up help the economy?

Thats right, it doesnt, it hurts the economy by putting the price of everything else up again.

Brown and his party are a bunch of thieving *****.
 
And how does putting fuel prices up help the economy?
They government will have more money to pay out more in unemployment benefits (today we recorded 2m unemployed) and invest in infrastructure to create more jobs.

Thats right, it doesnt, it hurts the economy by putting the price of everything else up again.
You'll find that the benefits from better infrastructure far outweigh the negatives from the average person paying 2p more a litre of fuel.

Brown and his party are a bunch of thieving *****.
Oh yeah, because he uses all of these taxes to increase his salary. He really is thieving. I've never understood while people accuse the government of "robbery" and "theft" when the money, for the vast majority of people, goes straight back to the people.
 
Obviously we aren't paying enough in taxes, otherwise they wouldn't put it up. Clearly in a recession the government needs to more money. 2p increase is perfectly reasonable in my opinion.

The lack of any smilies or hidden text lead me to believe you may well be serious. Maybe its time the government sorted out where all the money is actually going? Endlessly throwing money away to no avail to sort out problems it has played a large part in creating. Sadly it wont happen as to those in charge all these small increases here and there dont actually affect them.
 
They government will have more money to pay out more in unemployment benefits (today we recorded 2m unemployed) and invest in infrastructure to create more jobs.
And put another x thousand out of jobs due to fuel being the underpinning of society. put fuel up, everything else costs more at every point.

Oh yeah, because he uses all of these taxes to increase his salary. He really is thieving. I've never understood while people accuse the government of "robbery" and "theft" when the money, for the vast majority of people, goes straight back to the people.

HA-HA it doesn't go straight back to the people. it gets wasted in paper work and stupid schemes.

The government need to but out of things that do not concern them and concentrate on the things that do. That way they could cut taxes by a large amount.
 
You'll find that the benefits from better infrastructure far outweigh the negatives from the average person paying 2p more a litre of fuel. .

WHAT!!

Most fuel is bought by businesses, pretty much everything in this country moves by road. This could be the difference of life and death for many of our hauliers.

And the extra won't be spend on infrastructure. It'll just go into plugging the gaps left because tax revenues have fallen people lass people are working.

It's well known this government don't spend much on infrastructure, instead they spend on middle managers, traffic calming and computer systems that don't work.
 
Last edited:
HA-HA it doesn't go straight back to the people.
Yes, it does

it gets wasted in paper work and stupid schemes.
I never said money didn't get wasted. I also agree there is a LOT the government can do to trim fat, but still - the money goes back to the people

The government need to but out of things that do not concern them and concentrate on the things that do.
Yeah, fuel tax totally doesn't concern the government :rolleyes:
 
Most fuel is bought by businesses, pretty everything in this country moves by road.
Indeed.

This could be the difference of life and death for many of our hauliers.
I'd be willing to bet my entire life savings and everything I own that this increase isn't going to spell the death of "many hauliers". We'll soon see.

And the extra won't be spend on infrastructure. It'll just go into plugging the gaps left because tax revenues have fallen people lass people are working.
Exactly, so they won't need to cut back on public services as much as they would otherwise have to. The gap needs to be plugged somehow.

It's well known this government don't spend much on infrastructure, instead they spend on middle managers, traffic calming and computer systems that don't work.
Ah yes, I forgot that is all the government spend money on. Silly me not knowning when this is "well known"! I and everybody else should keep up to date with The Sun, The Mirror and the Daily Mail rather than experiencing Whitehall machinery first hand.
 
Yeah, fuel tax totally doesn't concern the government :rolleyes:

Have some :rolleyes: back.
I didn't say fuel duty wasn't there business. is aid the government sticks there nose into every aspect of our life. Which they shouldn't do and shouldn't be doing. if they butted out and concentrated on running the country and not peoples lifes we could easily cut tax.

Ah yes, I forgot that is all the government spend money on. Silly me not knowning when this is "well known"! I and everybody else should keep up to date with The Sun, The Mirror and the Daily Mail rather than experiencing Whitehall machinery first hand.


Over £1million to put in a set of traffic lights which are then turned of at rush hour is money well spent? Even though the breifing said the traffic problem is at rush hour, but declared a succes by teh council, even though locals campaigned before, during and after they installed.. Unfortunately this isn't a one of. Things like this happen everywhere.
 
Last edited:
Have some :rolleyes: back.
I didn't say fuel duty wasn't there business. is aid the government sticks there nose into every aspect of our life. Which they shouldn't do and shouldn't be doing. if they butted out and concentrated on running the country and not peoples lifes we could easily cut tax.
You're absolutely right. But even if Perfect-Government-1000(TM) took over tonight, it would be a long time before things change and an even longer time for money to free up. They need the money now, and it won't be too long before you can vote them out of office. Then, hopefully you'll see a leaner government in place.
 
I'd be willing to bet my entire life savings and everything I own that this increase isn't going to spell the death of "many hauliers". We'll soon see.

One thing I will agree on. It will make a difference however if they managed to survive when diesel was in the high £1.20's an extra 2p now shouldn't kill them off. I still cant see it having any real benefit though.
 
The government had to bail out the banks, therefore taxes need to be raised to pay for this. Console yourself with the thought all how much of Sir Fred Goodwin's £700k per year for life pension will be clawed back by an extra 2p per litre on petrol. Take that Goodwin (unless he moves abroad I suppose)!
 
The government had to bail out the banks, therefore taxes need to be raised to pay for this. Console yourself with the thought all how much of Sir Fred Goodwin's £700k per year for life pension will be clawed back by an extra 2p per litre on petrol. Take that Goodwin (unless he moves abroad I suppose)!

Apart from it's not being payed by the government and it's not a pension it;s severance pay. Something he is entitled to and is in his contract.
 
The government had to bail out the banks, therefore taxes need to be raised to pay for this. Console yourself with the thought all how much of Sir Fred Goodwin's £700k per year for life pension will be clawed back by an extra 2p per litre on petrol. Take that Goodwin (unless he moves abroad I suppose)!


It is being paid for by RBS.
 
You're absolutely right. But even if Perfect-Government-1000(TM) took over tonight, it would be a long time before things change and an even longer time for money to free up. They need the money now, and it won't be too long before you can vote them out of office. Then, hopefully you'll see a leaner government in place.

But there are other ways to get tax that could help the economy. Hitting fuel is not one of them and shouldn't of even been considered.
 
Apart from it's not being payed by the government and it's not a pension it;s severance pay. Something he is entitled to and is in his contract.

Except it is paid for by the government since RBS wouldn't have any cash if the government hadn't given it to them. We've been through this before so let's stick to the subject, why we're all going to have to pay more tax :( .
 
Except it is paid for by the government since RBS wouldn't have any cash if the government hadn't given it to them. We've been through this before so let's stick to the subject, why we're all going to have to pay more tax :( .

different pots of money.
 
Except it is paid for by the government since RBS wouldn't have any cash if the government hadn't given it to them. We've been through this before so let's stick to the subject, why we're all going to have to pay more tax :( .
The government hasn't handed cash to RBS. They've purchased shares in RBS. The government will, eventually, make a substantial profit from RBS (and Lloyds, and Northern Rock, etc). Good for us.
 
The government hasn't handed cash to RBS. They've purchased shares in RBS. The government will, eventually, make a substantial profit from RBS (and Lloyds, and Northern Rock, etc). Good for us.

And who gets the cash from the shares they've bought? The government didn't buy those shares as an investment you know, they did it because RBS would have gone bankrupt if they hadn't and that was a worse prospect than bailing them out and putting up taxes in future.
 
Back
Top Bottom