I'm not too worried, it's just a game I've been playing just before upgrading some parts so it was a good benchmark as I know exactly how it should be performing.its an old game, i'd say not worry about![]()
![]()
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I'm not too worried, it's just a game I've been playing just before upgrading some parts so it was a good benchmark as I know exactly how it should be performing.its an old game, i'd say not worry about![]()
![]()
That's an interesting point actually, well spotted. I'll have a look.When I ran a 3090 I had the same issue, what I found was that it was hitting a CPU limitation but it's hard to spot. Basically in your monitoring software you need to set the polling interval very low so you can actually see the individual CPU cores creeping up towards 100%. With a standard refresh interval of say 1000ms you find that the CPU appears to be not maxed out because it is constantly sharing the load around, it never runs one core at 100% for a whole second (meaning when it is monitored it might report say 60% utilisation), but it might be up near there for a couple of hundred ms.
That said, a 11900K is better than I have so you shouldn't have as much of a CPU limitation.
Goes without saying but make sure you crank up the settings that are heavy on GPU like maxing out RTX/AA etc.
Yeah I did try DX11, it's certainly smoother so will be switching back to it but I get nowhere near as much FPS with it for some reason. I only have DX12 on now for the direct comparison with my old setup.Might be nothing, but I noticed you said you have BFV in DX12, which is notoriously buggy, and only really needed if you want RT. Have you tried in DX11 to see if it makes any difference?
I got a blue BSOD after enabling XMP so I'm just this minute updating the BIOS to 707!!Cool. You'll gain quite a bit of performance with XMP on, as 2133Mhz with bad timings will severely limit the 11900k. Tested BFV since setting XMP?
Your motherboard BIOS is very old, from January. The latest BIOS has fixes, performance improvements and new microcode for Rocket Lake, which will further improve things.
https://rog.asus.com/uk/motherboards/rog-strix/rog-strix-z590-e-gaming-wifi-model/helpdesk_bios
Link above is to the WIFI edition of the motherboard - not sure if you have this or the non wifi one. Either way, update to Version 0707 ASAP, and turn back on XMP!
Be noted, these BIOS updates that contain CPU microcode updates seem quite scary when updating - they'll reboot you PC several times, you'll get quite a few black screens while it loads the microcode updater. Let it run until you're back at POST (my Maximus XIII board took around 4 minutes!)
I will get you that info shortly, thanks.which map and mode you play? i would like to play them with my old 2700x and see how it performs with an ampere gpu
and exact settings, if i may request
Best I can do with my monitor is 3440x1440 and up the Res scale in game to 200%, all that did though was lower FPS to around 40fps, GPU usage went up a bit.What happens if you run bfv at 8k do you get 100% gpu usage?
Yes it is a bit worryingly tbh, I'll check that out and get back to you shortly. And yeah its the ram Listed in my sig.If it's not stable XMP that's worrying, what RAM do you have? Dominator Platinum as per your sig?
Are you running the memory in gear1 or gear2? Gear1 means IMC (cpu's memory controller) is running the same speed as the RAM. You can confirm this in CPUZ by checking "mem controller freq" and "DRAM frequency". 3200Mhz is quite slow memory so you should be running it in gear 1.
Looking at this at idle it owuld appear that both frequencies are the same (XMP off obviously).If it's not stable XMP that's worrying, what RAM do you have? Dominator Platinum as per your sig?
Are you running the memory in gear1 or gear2? Gear1 means IMC (cpu's memory controller) is running the same speed as the RAM. You can confirm this in CPUZ by checking "mem controller freq" and "DRAM frequency". 3200Mhz is quite slow memory so you should be running it in gear 1.
Stand by, I'll go get that info, if I can find it.You should start testing one stick of RAM at a time as well. XMP 3200 should be no problem. Might have a bad stick/other memory related issue that BFV is triggering (and the issue when XMP is enabled could point to that as well).
What SA voltage and CPU IO 2 voltage is the BIOS setting by default when you enable XMP? They might be called something else like VCCSA and VCCIO2 in your board's BIOS.
Also, if running CPU at stock, try disabling SpeedStep and enabling SpeedShift (in BIOS). For starters you should see a slight improvement in Cinebench R20, and I think it should help with gaming even though the issue must be something else. If you're running Windows High Performance then it won't make a difference, or shouldn't, as that will/should ignore the BIOS SpeedShift setting.
Okay, disable SpeedStep completely and leave SpeedShift enabled for buttery smooth gameplay on Rocket Lake and better Cinebench results at stock.
As for those three VCCs, I wish I was familiar with Asus Z590 BIOS as they sound like they could be something else (I'm using an MSI Z590 currently). VCCSA Load Line Cal(ibration) sounds like an additional setting for the actual VCCSA. And the the other two settings sound like they are for booting voltages, not for later voltages.
So I would explore more, see if you find the actual VCCSA etc tucked away elsewhere, and don't just make note of whether it's on Auto, make a note of the actual voltages which should be displayed alongside.
One thing I don't know if you've mentioned already, and it's important, is whether you have removed the power limits on your board or not? They need removing with Rocket Lake. If unsure you can easily check by seeing how much CPU Package Power is used after a Cinebench R20 run, with HWiNFO64. If it's (quite a lot) more than 125W (as you have an 11900K), then they are removed. Some boards do it by default, I'm not sure if absolutely every Z590 does it. With MSI Z590 it asks you whether you have the boxed cooler or tower style cooler or liquid cooler and removes the power limits accordingly. Your board may have done something similar when you set it up or have them removed by default.
Yep.
Good find. Just missing the VCSSA now.
Are you using two or four sticks?