32GB Memory Recommendation & Advice

Associate
Joined
4 Nov 2010
Posts
377
I’m wanting 32gb of memory for a new build I’m going to do.
I was looking at the Vengence RGB Pro, when blindly just glancing through.
Then I saw both the Balastix RGB with tighter timings and Team Group (but no RGB)

Memory, PSU and Motherboards are the most confusing for me. Can I ask the following;
Is it best to get 2x16gb or 4x8gb? (4x RGB would look better, 2x would give space for upgrade, however, is there a technical difference?)
Is 3600mhz the best speed to get? (Thinking of going with 5900x and a 3080 or above Nvidea card)
Is the RGB stuff straight forward or do I have to get the right motherboard to match to be able to use?

Thanks in advance. 10 years ago, the choice was way more simple.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
25 Oct 2002
Posts
31,745
Location
Hampshire
First up, there's no way I would choose to fill all my RAM slots simply for aesthetics. So 2x16GB dual rank would be best.
Speed wise, I would say 3600mhz is the sweet spot for value as can be had for £100 or thereabouts.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Aug 2019
Posts
3,031
Location
SW Florida
is 3600 a decent upgrade from 3200? I have 64GB LPX and might downgrade to 32GB

I rcommend look at timings before making that call.

I would go 3200 c14 before 3600 c18 myself. Also, if you have something like 3200 c16 now, 3600 c16 would be better but not enough that I would spend money for the small improvement.
 
Associate
Joined
30 Dec 2005
Posts
2,472
The above memory is pretty hard to find from any reputable UK retailer and is pretty expensive.

I'd rather spend £100-150 on a decent 32GB 3600mhz CL16 kit and use the money elsewhere on a GPU upgrade etc.

Which would you get, Crucial Ballistix, Dominator (CL14), LPX or other?
I'm looking for something for my X570 and 3900x which might get upgraded down the line
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Apr 2014
Posts
29,492
Location
Dominating rooms with symmetry
Which would you get, Crucial Ballistix, Dominator (CL14), LPX or other?
I'm looking for something for my X570 and 3900x which might get upgraded down the line

I'd go for these: https://www.corsair.com/uk/en/Categories/Products/Memory/VENGEANCE-RGB-RT-Black/p/CMN32GX4M2Z3600C16

You can pick them up £20-30 cheaper than the price shown there sometimes. That said, I wouldn't upgrade from 3200 CL16 to 3600 CL16.

3600+ mhz CL14 and 15 kits seem to be stupid money, likely due to the binning process.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Jun 2008
Posts
11,618
Location
Finland
I know naff all about timings lol
Lower the number the better.
Because it's literally time delay in clock cycles/pulses.

Though of course clock speed has effect and faster enough clock speeds can make up for couple cycle difference in timing:
14 clock cycles at 3200MHz is only tiny bit faster than 16 cycles at 3600MHz. (~8.75 ns vs ~8.89 ns)

With Ryzens 3600MHz 16-16-16 is the sweet spot for the best memory performance, if you don't want to do manual tweaking.
Though Samsung B-die chips using DIMMs cost quite a lot.
Crucial Ballistix with Micron chips is usually notably cheaper.
But Samsung B-die is the only shot for guaranteed dual rank in 16GB DIMMs.
 
Soldato
Joined
23 Jul 2009
Posts
14,097
Location
Bath
Gonna hijack this thread a little:

What real world performance difference is there gonna be between 3600mhz c18 and 3600mhz c16? Given that the former can be had in 32gb for £99 and the latter for £179, is it really £80 of value for gaming and other fairly mundane tasks?
 
Soldato
Joined
6 May 2009
Posts
19,924
Gonna hijack this thread a little:

What real world performance difference is there gonna be between 3600mhz c18 and 3600mhz c16?
6ns :p

Depends on the kit but if you can raise frequency and lower timings then you should notice a difference in gaming, especially if you game at 1080p or play high framerate games in general
 
Associate
Joined
29 Jan 2003
Posts
1,102
Lower the number the better.
Because it's literally time delay in clock cycles/pulses.

Though of course clock speed has effect and faster enough clock speeds can make up for couple cycle difference in timing:
14 clock cycles at 3200MHz is only tiny bit faster than 16 cycles at 3600MHz. (~8.75 ns vs ~8.89 ns)

With Ryzens 3600MHz 16-16-16 is the sweet spot for the best memory performance

Does that count across the whole range of Ryzen or does it change as you move up (or down) the range?
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Jun 2008
Posts
11,618
Location
Finland
Does that count across the whole range of Ryzen or does it change as you move up (or down) the range?
Because of very mediocre memory controller original Zen and slightly tweaked Zen+ architecture/generation Ryzens were pretty much limited to max 3200MHz memory speed.

Zen2 and Zen3 have good memory controller capable to above 4000Mhz speeds.
Though CPU's internal blocks connecting InfinityFabric bus is kind of limit.
While you can decouple IF clock from memory controller clock, that unsync adds around 10ns to memory access latency hurting gaming performance.
3600MHz is basically that "110% achievable" speed for every CPU.
But getting IF to 3800MHz needs good CPU and correctly tweaked settings.
 
Associate
Joined
29 Jan 2003
Posts
1,102
Because of very mediocre memory controller original Zen and slightly tweaked Zen+ architecture/generation Ryzens were pretty much limited to max 3200MHz memory speed.

Zen2 and Zen3 have good memory controller capable to above 4000Mhz speeds.
Though CPU's internal blocks connecting InfinityFabric bus is kind of limit.
While you can decouple IF clock from memory controller clock, that unsync adds around 10ns to memory access latency hurting gaming performance.
3600MHz is basically that "110% achievable" speed for every CPU.
But getting IF to 3800MHz needs good CPU and correctly tweaked settings.

Interesting, thanks - I must admit I've never really paid enough attention to RAM but this has prompted me to do some more reading :)
 
Back
Top Bottom