3d Mark 06 scores thread

Sparky191 · 7 Nov 2006 at 06:18

P4 3.4Ghz Dual Core & 7900GS both @ Stock 3D Mark 06 = 4151
P4 3.0Ghz Single Core & 6800GS noth @ Stock 3D Mark 06 = 2106

J.D · 7 Nov 2006 at 09:34

Here's a score I got back when I went through my big TWO hour overclocking marathon lol. I learned in about 20 mins what to do then got it to said speeds in my sig and on first crash at stock volts I just left it where it was and enjoyed my gaming.

Xeon · 14 Nov 2006 at 09:33

Asrock Dual Sata + Opty 146 @ 2.55ghz + Palit 7900GS @ 600/1420 = 4374

(note: some artifacts seen in last 10 secs of deep freeze test)

Duff-Man · 14 Nov 2006 at 10:23

Running the card at 650/2000 for 24/7 use though.

Jezzer · 14 Nov 2006 at 10:56

3DMark Score 6322 3DMarks

SM 2.0 Score 2538 Marks

SM 3.0 Score 2522 Marks

CPU Score 2524 Marks

jrodga2k5 · 14 Nov 2006 at 13:48

Duff-Man said:
Running the card at 650/2000 for 24/7 use though.

Finally a GTX score

thankyou

fornowagain · 14 Nov 2006 at 15:51

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=632901
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2329088

titaniumx3 · 14 Nov 2006 at 19:10

bringerofdecay said:
AMD athlon64 3500+ @stock(2201mhz)
1GB kingston 'extra value' RAM(total carp )
ATI radeon x1900xt (256) @stock

only got 3699 (i blame RAM and processor :/)
can't list the points without doing it again, so you will have to be happy with 3699

You should be getting at least 4500 with that setup. I have the same specs as you (except I have the 512mb radeon x1900xt) and I get 4650. Could be the ram; is it two sticks running in dual channel?

2bullish · 14 Nov 2006 at 19:22

fornowagain said:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=632901
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2329088

Ill see your 20181 and raise you...

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=12&projectId=

to 21027

fornowagain · 14 Nov 2006 at 20:05

2bullish said:
Ill see your 20181 and raise you...

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/projectdetails.jsp?projectType=12&projectId=

to 21027

Link doesn't work.

Anyway your holding twice the cards? (See the pun, crack myself up

)

MadMatty · 14 Nov 2006 at 22:57

I got some new numbers in my sig now ive recently got a X1950pro. cant post compare urls yet as the orb doesnt recognise card :| I was expecting abit more upgrading from an X800XT but i guess i can at least have sm3 and hq af now

2bullish · 14 Nov 2006 at 23:53

fornowagain said:
Link doesn't work.

Anyway your holding twice the cards? (See the pun, crack myself up )

Ran it again I cranked the cpu up a notch.

[/IMG]

Extra 300 points

fornowagain · 15 Nov 2006 at 00:06

Aw shucks, can't touch that. I'll just have to get another one in beside it, looking lonely. Nice score there btw, what's the 06?

2bullish · 15 Nov 2006 at 00:14

fornowagain said:
Aw shucks, can't touch that. I'll just have to get another one in beside it, looking lonely. Nice score there btw, what's the 06?

This is where I cannot compete as your cards SM2.0 support is far superior.

fornowagain · 15 Nov 2006 at 00:31

That's me lot without a volt mod on the gpu.

SimonMaltby · 15 Nov 2006 at 09:05

I have moved from Crossfired X1900's to the 8800gtx. I picked up the Albertron card for at a great price... horrible sticker, but just as good a card as the BFG. Does 633core and 2150mem so far

Cost wise... a pair of crossfire x1950's would cost slightly more than the 8800gtx.

At last the Nvidia cards gives as good, or better image quality... thats why i moved from Nvidia to ATI awhile ago.

Performance.
The 8800gtx beats all my existing benchmarks with xfire and this is with my CPU clocked far lower.

These are all with my cpu at 3.8ghz, my previous best with the crossfire were recorded at 4.1Ghz

3D2001.
8800gtx scores 64,219 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9089424
x1900 xfire score was 63k

3D2006.
8800gtx scores 12,167 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=633353
x1900 xfire score was 11,100

These scores are all out of the box settings.

The other thing that has suprised me is how quiet the card is. Temps are very low and it does not turn the fan past silent at all.

Liquid_Entity · 15 Nov 2006 at 13:21

3dmark06 basic results score of 4573 - is that good or bad ??

Liquid_Entity · 15 Nov 2006 at 13:33

Liquid_Entity said:
3dmark06 basic results score of 4573 - is that good or bad ??

http://www.mattsexton.plus.com/3dmark.JPG

AMD Athlon 64 3700+
2gb Geil Value DDR 400 Dual CH Memory (2 x 1gb)
MSI GEFORCE 7900GT/GTO 512mb
ASROCK 939DualSATA2 Mobo

oweneades · 15 Nov 2006 at 13:37

Liquid_Entity said:
http://www.mattsexton.plus.com/3dmark.JPG

AMD Athlon 64 3700+
2gb Geil Value DDR 400 Dual CH Memory (2 x 1gb)
MSI GEFORCE 7900GT/GTO 512mb
ASROCK 939DualSATA2 Mobo

Well I would say if thats everything at stock (or roughly stock) then that score is pretty good.

Normally a dual core cpu will add roughly 500-1000 points to the score iirc (depending on the setup and the cpu).

Liquid_Entity · 15 Nov 2006 at 13:38

oweneades said:
Well I would say if thats everything at stock (or roughly stock) then that score is pretty good.

Normally a dual core cpu will add roughly 500-1000 points to the score iirc (depending on the setup and the cpu).

yeah everything is stock, i wouldnt want to overclock as im useless with that kind of stuff.