• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

3DMark CPU Profile Bench

Radox-0 said:
Wow very nice. Got to confess do not understand that score (not doubting it FYI) and some on this benchmark in general. Lower clock speeds and numbers across every run compared with Lt Matt's but the MT one jumps ahead!
Click to expand...
Same here, Matts OC is quite a bit higher too, single thread makes sense, could it be temps as more cores are loaded up? The i9 scores look predictable with clockspeed, but not AMD's?
 
Radox-0 said:
Wow very nice. Got to confess do not understand that score (not doubting it FYI) and some on this benchmark in general. Lower clock speeds and numbers across every run compared with Lt Matt's but the MT one jumps ahead!
Click to expand...
Forgot to add ... yours is a great score for a cpu thats nearly 4 years old! :)
 
Radox-0 said:
Wow very nice. Got to confess do not understand that score (not doubting it FYI) and some on this benchmark in general. Lower clock speeds and numbers across every run compared with Lt Matt's but the MT one jumps ahead!
Click to expand...

Just overclocked it like you would an intel CPU, no boost and a fixed all core overclock.

Lower core counts don't do so well (lack of boost) but MT scales better.:)

Scoreboard updated.:)
 
Last edited:
Kaapstad said:
Just overclocked it like you would an intel CPU, no boost and a fixed all core overclock.

Lower core counts don't do so well (lack of boost) but MT scales better.:)

Scoreboard updated.:)
Click to expand...

Ahh interesting, so the other Ryzen scores as more cores come online frequency must be dipping much lower. Not unexpected of course as that's how Intel also behaves, was thinking the 5 Ghz+ numbers was all core.

turbot1984 said:
Forgot to add ... yours is a great score for a cpu thats nearly 4 years old! :)
Click to expand...

Yup, arm and a leg way back, can suck power like no ones business :o but still performs pretty solid. Imagine I will keep it until we are few years into DDR5 era now and just update my main gaming PC if need be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom