No - 40+(40x0)+1 = 41
40+40x0+1 = 1
One equation has brackets, one does not. You can't just make brackets appear out of thin air.
If there are meant to be brackets - put them in. More to the point - who actually really cares?
Meh
Essentially, applying the rules of Maths (BODMAS as mentioned) makes the formula the same as the one you've given above. The brackets are implicit.
Brackets can be used to change the calculation order, but there is a default approach that should be taken.
) but you can't go saying "FACT" and expect people just to accept it when it is clearly wrong.So if you use a calculator that does not follow the correct rules for mathematics then the answer is ok "coz it says so on the screen" ?![]()
No - 40+(40x0)+1 = 41
40+40x0+1 = 1
One equation has brackets, one does not. You can't just make brackets appear out of thin air.
If there are meant to be brackets - put them in. More to the point - who actually really cares?
Meh
I'll do some real maths when you can write "real" English![]()
p.s. this is a tongue-in-cheek comment![]()


I can't believe this thread is still going. It's like the plane on the treadmill incident all over again...
I’ve never seen so many mathematicians in one place before.![]()
So why not put the bloody brackets in then? No-one really cares (apart from 'ooooh, I'm so clever because I did ADVANCED maths and I'm therefore much better than you' clippies).No, sorry, you are just wrong.
In the absence of brackets, you do not just go from left to right, you apply the rules according to order of operations.
Brackets
Orders
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction
So as there are no brackets, no orders and no division, the first operator you use is the multiplication (40x0), then the addition.
This isn't negotiable, this isn't opinion, these are the hard and fast rules of mathematics. If you don't do it, you're doing it wrong and you don't understand maths. I know this country has massive issues with poor education, literacy and numeracy, but this sort of thing does actually scare me...


.I can't believe this thread is still going. It's like the plane on the treadmill incident all over again...
Why did you bring that up.
Here we go again
3
2
.
.
.
,
So why not put the bloody brackets in then? No-one really cares (apart from 'ooooh, I'm so clever because I did ADVANCED maths and I'm therefore much better than you' clippies).
These so called ''''rules'''' were not taught at GCSE levels 20 years ago. That is a fact, so poke that where the sun don't shine pal.
So why not put the bloody brackets in then? No-one really cares (apart from 'ooooh, I'm so clever because I did ADVANCED maths and I'm therefore much better than you' clippies).
These so called ''''rules'''' were not taught at GCSE levels 20 years ago. That is a fact, so poke that where the sun don't shine pal.
Of course it would, it will 'fly' at any point when lift is greater than mass. Lift is generated by the movement of air over the wings, facilitated by the propeller.

Of course it would, it will 'fly' at any point when lift is greater than mass. Lift is generated by the movement of air over the wings, facilitated by the propeller.
I remember this thread... it sucked.
It's going to end just as well as all the religion threads do.