• Notice regarding image hosts and attachments. See here.

4k 50" TV

I'd would put my money on a good quality 1080 tv against that one.

Still if it helps drive the price down its never a bad thing.

4K tv for the masses still looks to me like its a 4/5 years away given the fairly slow progression of 1080 in live tv.
 
Yep, i just want the picture quality without all the stupid camera and remote rubbish.

i think the camera (skype) and remotes are fine, it's all the other stupid apps which we have no real use for.

i only use skype and youtube, i know others will use netflix and iplayers as well, imo apps like these are useful.

twitter, facebook, games, news, weather, etc not so much as we can use out phones/tablets for a much faster and easier experience.

what they are trying to do is basically get rid of HTPC's and replace them with the smart functions.

imo this is always going to be worse, it adds to the costs and theres more stuff that can go wrong. tv's should be focusing on tv first and additional items second but i think samsung are the main culprit for pushing "smart" tv's.
 
HDMI 1.4 increases the maximum resolution to 4K × 2K, i.e. 3840 × 2160p (Quad HD) at 24 Hz/25 Hz/30 Hz or 4096 × 2160p at 24 Hz (which is a resolution used with digital theaters).

You could run mad VR to scale 1080p from PC to 4k then.
Need beast of GPU !
 
I would love a TV with no added bits and bobs, just something with the best possible image quality/lag.

then you need to look at low end panasonic plasma models, a UT50 or X60B, etc.

all high end panels apart from possibly professional ones which cost £5K+, all come with "smart" functions.

the kuro is the only one i can think of, but it is now old, no warranty, power hungry and only available second hand in very very small numbers.

smart functions for me are more useful than 3d, then again i would only use a smart function maybe once every 2 weeks
 
Personally I think it should be the HIGH end models which come with no frills etc.

They should be excellent PQ screens that look good /smart when off, and have 3+ HDMI sockets (and even options with no tuners or speakers either).

If you want smart features buy a cheapish blu ray player and these now come as standard / or freeview/sky box.

I cant remember the last time I actually used the tuner on my Kuro, Ive had an HD freeview stb for so long.
 
I would love a TV with no added bits and bobs, just something with the best possible image quality/lag.

Get something like the new gt60 it has 5500000:1 contrast ratio and a 3000hz ffd and input lag is just 24ms in game mode.

Or if you want something cheaper get a st50 like I got you can pick them up for 700 quid 50 inch and the input lag is just 16ms in game mode.
 
Running a htpc all I want is a good panel too, especially blacks. No need for smart features.
Tbh all I want is a single hdmi port and the best raw pq

No content for 4k so no need for me
 
Personally I think it should be the HIGH end models which come with no frills etc.

They should be excellent PQ screens that look good /smart when off, and have 3+ HDMI sockets (and even options with no tuners or speakers either).

If you want smart features buy a cheapish blu ray player and these now come as standard / or freeview/sky box.

I cant remember the last time I actually used the tuner on my Kuro, Ive had an HD freeview stb for so long.

that would be a stupid way to do things.

here is our top of the range tv, but it doesn't come with any of the features our mid range sets have.

imagine buying a top of the range Rolls Royce with no leather seats, no wood finish, no sat nav, no stereo, just the chassis, 4 wheels and an engine.

why would you not want a tuner built in? i was thinking about buying a Humax HD PVR for my old tv but my new GT50 has HD freeview built in and i can record also to a USB stick, saved myself £300. it has 4 hdmi sockets and i think 3 usb sockets as standard too.

before i only had sd freeview and used playtv for sd pvr.

why would i want more boxes if one can do them all for a cheaper price? it would only make sense if it was cheaper to do it your way but it isn't in most cases.

also they would never make an option with no speakers or tuners, because that would mean making another model which is specifically for a very very small minority of people, which means they would end up making a loss because the gap in the market is so small.

that's the reason why the ZT is only available in 1 model in Europe, to keep costs down.

smart functions are essentially an add on, you arent being forced to use them but they are their for people who do.

same goes for tuners, speakers, stands, 3d, etc.

the more functions it can do the better.

my 50" GT50 with 2 x 3D glasses, 4 x hdmi, 3 x USB, smart functions, HD tuners for both freesat and freeview, recording to USB and 5 year warranty costs £799.99.

it can be calibrated to reference quality, how much more PQ do you want for such little money?

if i tried to buy all of the above separately, i'm guessing it would cost double at least
 
Last edited:
I cant wait for 4k TVs i will happily pay about £750 for a 50" 4k TV from a proper manufacturer with a few years guarantee
My current 42" LG tv cost £500 couple/3 years ago and im not going to upgrade until 4k is feasible, i just don't see the need until then. 3D is just a bit crap tbh
 
that would be a stupid way to do things.

here is our top of the range tv, but it doesn't come with any of the features our mid range sets have.

imagine buying a top of the range Rolls Royce with no leather seats, no wood finish, no sat nav, no stereo, just the chassis, 4 wheels and an engine.

Imagine an M3 with no radio, virtually no sound proofing, thinner glass, no AC. Oh wait... there is one, it's called the M3 CSL. Choosing automotive as your example industry was clearly a silly idea. Oh there's the clio cup variants as well. I'm sure there's plenty more examples but you get the point.

Nothing wrong with wanting the best panel for your money at the expense of feature you are never likely to use, IMO.
 
Imagine an M3 with no radio, virtually no sound proofing, thinner glass, no AC. Oh wait... there is one, it's called the M3 CSL. Choosing automotive as your example industry was clearly a silly idea. Oh there's the clio cup variants as well. I'm sure there's plenty more examples but you get the point.

Nothing wrong with wanting the best panel for your money at the expense of feature you are never likely to use, IMO.

the M3 CSL is a very specific type of car only a pure petrol head would consider one over a normal M3, the reason why i chose rolls royce as my example.

also there are professional displays are their not which do what he wants, they also cost several £K

here is a £7,999 one below for example

http://www.avforums.com/reviews/Pan...0-65-Inch-3D-Plasma-TV-Review_243/Review.html


Cons
Quite expensive
No built-in TV tuner or speakers
No internet platform or streaming capability
Calibration controls are a little limited
Important functions are hidden in sub-menus
Remote control is a bit of a disappointment


as you can see they are available but not for the majority of people. they are for pure enthusiasts, which is an extremely small market therefore the price reflects that so that they do not make a loss catering to such a niche market.

no tv manufacturer would mass produce such a tv because the masses dont actually care about PQ that much, so long as it says full HD that pretty much means to them it is the best PQ on the planet.
 

Believe it or not you don't know everything - so please don't come across as so "high and mighty / I know best" all the time.

Everyone has their own opinion, and that is fair enough - but there are a lot of high end AV manufacturer's who actually design very minimalist designs on purpose (less chance of interference for one thing) and make a very nice profit every year.

In regards to this inparticular - I said High end models for several reasons;

1) The high end models are going to be focused on those customers who DO want PQ above everything else and are willing to pay for it (and have done in the past with Kuro's etc etc throughout the years)

2) TV's without tuners can be classified as "monitors" and therefore have a much lower import tax attached , which therefore leads to a smaller rrp for the customer. Im pretty sure this is still the case, it certainly was historically.

3) Personally speaking I have gone through a lot more STB's over the years than I ever have TV's, because the former are effectively throw away items these days, and added features come out every year or every other year when my Kuro has already lasted four or so. Whether its added storage (admittedly less of a problem now) , HD tuners, or whatever else - its a lot easier to get the added feature for that year in a separate box than getting a new tv each time.

Given the progress these days in tv transmission, its gaurenteed the current tuners installed in today's TV's are not going to be suitable for the whole life of the tv.

4) I never said this would be of interest to the mass market. It wouldn't be. Doesn't mean its not viable for a limited run (just like the ZT range of Plasmas coming out from Panasonic, with a limited run with ~£4k price tag )

5) High end users are most likely to have a separate amp and speakers anyway, so no need to build these into the chassis in the first place) Kuro's for one don't have speakers built in (although seperates are available to plug directly in).


Stop mixing high end with bog-standard. Im not talking about a standard retail offering - you don't even get Kuro reference PQ for that kind of money now and they are 4 years old or so, that (blatantly) isn't the market I was talking about.

You brought mass-production into the discussion - I always stressed High - End which is EXACTLY the opposite (but can still make profit for the company involved)
 
Last edited:
Believe it or not you don't know everything - so please don't come across as so "high and mighty / I know best" all the time.

Everyone has their own opinion, and that is fair enough - but there are a lot of high end AV manufacturer's who actually design very minimalist designs on purpose (less chance of interference for one thing) and make a very nice profit every year.

In regards to this inparticular - I said High end models for several reasons;

1) The high end models are going to be focused on those customers who DO want PQ above everything else and are willing to pay for it (and have done in the past with Kuro's etc etc throughout the years)

then the ZT is for you, but im pretty sure that comes with tuners and speakers, etc as well as smart functions, etc

2) TV's without tuners can be classified as "monitors" and therefore have a much lower import tax attached , which therefore leads to a smaller rrp for the customer. Im pretty sure this is still the case, it certainly was historically.

well why do these cost £8K then like the one i linked above?

3) Personally speaking I have gone through a lot more STB's over the years than I ever have TV's, because the former are effectively throw away items these days, and added features come out every year or every other year when my Kuro has already lasted four or so. Whether its added storage (admittedly less of a problem now) , HD tuners, or whatever else - its a lot easier to get the added feature for that year in a separate box than getting a new tv each time.

i haven't went through any set top boxes, i just used the built in one on my last tv before buying playtv for my ps3, then using that as my pvr. my new tv now does HD and recording built in, i do not need any other features, as they can be done through the tv, therefore nowadays stb's are a thing of the past, they are no longer needed, essentially saving you £100's because the tv's do all of the features they do, stb's are now effectively obsolete.

Given the progress these days in tv transmission, its gaurenteed the current tuners installed in today's TV's are not going to be suitable for the whole life of the tv.

progress is usually very slow when it comes to tv transmission, it took them years to switch the whole country to digital, in fact they usually do not like to force changes therefore legacy channels are usually transmitted simultaneously like bbc1 and bbc1 hd is now, therefore in the future if bbc 4k was introduced, im pretty sure they would keep either bbc or bbc1 hd along side it, therefore i would still be able to see that channel.

4) I never said this would be of interest to the mass market. It wouldn't be. Doesn't mean its not viable for a limited run (just like the ZT range of Plasmas coming out from Panasonic, with a limited run with ~£4k price tag )

those come with speakers and smart functions, etc, etc.

as you can see the type of tv you are after costs double that, and seriously who is going to pay £7K for a tv with none of these functions when they can get a ZT for £4K?


5) High end users are most likely to have a separate amp and speakers anyway, so no need to build these into the chassis in the first place) Kuro's for one don't have speakers built in (although seperates are available to plug directly in).

yes they do usually have seperates, but to make 2 models one with those things and one without would end up costing more money, therefore it is better to include them and let the enthusiasts just leave them dormant and use their seperates. it makes absolutely no sense to make an option without these things as it is not financially viable, that's why pioneer had to withdraw from the market in the first place, they were making a loss with the route they had taken, the market is so small there is no profit in it. the reason why the ZT is only available in one size in europe is proof of this.

there is no money to be made in the enthusiast market, sets would become so expensive nobody would buy them and opt for the cheaper models.

seriously would you buy a ZT with no tuners, no smart functions, no 3d for £10K? when you can have one with it for £4K? the more models you make the increase in costs and those costs have to be passed on, normal people will not be willing to pay those increased costs so they will have to be forced onto the enthusiast sets.



Stop mixing high end with bog-standard. Im not talking about a standard retail offering - you don't even get Kuro reference PQ for that kind of money now and they are 4 years old or so, that (blatantly) isn't the market I was talking about.

you can actually get better tv's than the Kuros these days, there is a huge debate over at avforums, and a professional calibrator over there says the in store VT is better than the in store kuro, so i imagine the ZT is a lot lot better.

You brought mass-production into the discussion - I always stressed High - End which is EXACTLY the opposite (but can still make profit for the company involved)

if it can make a profit why did pioneer withdraw from the market?
 
Back
Top Bottom