Nope, YouTube compression noticeable.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
4k resolution = bad draw distance and rendering.... still in 2021
- Thread starter jasonsony735
- Start date
Running an 8700k and surprisingly my Gigabyte Z390 Gaming X recently got a bios update with resize bar added.
Soldato
Well it kinda does, I understand what you mean but when you think about it the higher resolution makes the image more clear and then you see pop in more easily.
1080p to 4k that much image quality improvement you definitely will see more of the unwanted pop in.
Soldato
Really? I am running Asus hero X and still nothing here
https://www.gigabyte.com/uk/Motherboard/Z390-GAMING-X-rev-10/support#support-dl
Yeah. Rather surprised, not tried it though. "F10i
- Enable Resizable Base-Address Register (Resizable-BAR) option to enhance GPU performance"
Soldato
Nice hopefully Asus do the same
Associate
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2016
- Posts
- 1,308
AC games such as Valhalla, are just badly ported console rehashes. Ubisoft what do you expect?
With no RT, no DLSS and lacking even basic optimisation for PC.
They are designed to run at 60fps on 1440p on a console.
With no RT, no DLSS and lacking even basic optimisation for PC.
They are designed to run at 60fps on 1440p on a console.
The option won't work until support is enabled in the graphics card drivers.
100%
Console ports should NEVER be the benchmark for pc comparisons and gpu performance.
I very rarely play so called 'AAA' titles as they are invariably just poorly optimised ports.
Honestly the whole subject needs to avoid the comparisons of console hardware completely and this forum would be all the better for it.
Cyberpunk 2077 is horrid on 4K in that respect - at 1440p I largely don't notice that some of the building textures used for long distance are like original Xbox resolution but in 4K you can't avoid noticing it - especially on a 43" 4K display.
Don't the drivers for the RX6800 already support it? Or the graphics drivers need to explicitly support the motherboard chipset too?
Associate
I have a 28" 4K panel but it is too laggy for gaming really and largely relegated now. Mostly use my 1440p 144Hz Dell but also got a Philips Momentum 43" (great for stuff like racing games with the wheel).
Soldato
I would be in this mindset too. Maybe it will change but I think once you go to standard TV on the wall size (>42") it becomes too big to sit and use on a standard desktop arrangement - no?
Soldato
That still makes zero sense. The engine being worked on is what you meant for engine release end of year time is what you trying to say? Cause no games are releasing on UE5 this year and certainly nothing that would be native UE5 so at least 3 years away before we see the impact from that tbh. Epic is moving Fortnite to UE5 mid this year prior to official engine release, literally the only game known currently to be doing so and I expect they will be re-writing a lot of code to bring the new features to show it off which isn't something most devs do.
Is there a potential that "special" customers could already be using it to develop games?
Soldato
Yuck this is why I hate tech forums.
Edit: Yuck this is why I love tech forums but hate commenting on tech forums in case I get a slightest thing wrong and some alpha-dog jumps down my throat.