5 "good" GCSE's HARD?

Permabanned
Joined
26 Apr 2008
Posts
4,078
Location
Lincolnshire
My guess would be that 99% of the kids there just don't want to do well in GCSEs. It would take very little effort to get 5 Cs I'm sure but if someone really doesnt want to do it, you can't force them.
 
I thought you got a C for writing your name on the paper these days. ;)

very wrong.

you need to get most of the test right for a C if you are doing the lower paper. which means a few silly mistakes on big questions and you fail.
 
I don't care! I was part of the 1st year to take GCSEs back in '87 and I managed 5 A grades amongst other A-C passes.

Sorry but, considering just how easy today's exam questions are, anyone who doesn't get a decent grade is downright dense!
 
Depends which tier paper you take, Higher, Intermediate or Foundation.

Higher Papers are usually marked A - D, Intermediate - B - E, and Foundation C - G or something like that. So the chances of getting a good grade is usually defined by that.

That's what it was like when I were in school anyway.
 
probably more the parents fault than anything else tbh....

you can't polish a turd - if a teacher is confronted with a bunch of ***** kids from the local estate and the parents don't really give a **** about education and haven't really taught them how to behave properly in the first place then they'll probably fail at school, life, everything else too tbh....
 
probably more the parents fault than anything else tbh....

you can't polish a turd - if a teacher is confronted with a bunch of ***** kids from the local estate and the parents don't really give a **** about education and haven't really taught them how to behave properly in the first place then they'll probably fail at school, life, everything else too tbh....

Exactly. Just a drain on society.
 
What the poster above said is very true.

I do IT support in primary schools and i have seen good and bad teaching, good and bad kids and good and bad buildings.

You can have mediocre teaching staff in a school in a "posh" area and they will do well purely because the kids are generally well behaved and the parents actually take an interest and they learn well as a result.

You can also have really good teaching staff who are at thier wits end because the kids ( sorry feral rats ) they are required to teach spend most of the day fighting, punching the staff or arent even there. The parents are also known to hit the staff when they are called into school for a meeting to discuss truancy.

"ya callin me scum eh! ****** teachers! scum the lot of ye!" etc etc

If the kids in an area are feral and roam the streets in packs then what chance to normal hard working teachers have in getting them to sit down for an hour in a lesson and learn something? these kids dont know how to sit down and listen, they are actively tought to play up in class and "dont let the ******** get you down!" :rolleyes:

A friend of my girlfriend has given up primary school teaching after 6 years as she simply cant cope with the parents. Shes been threatened dozens of times, has her tyres slashed and had a firework shoved though her letterbox. She knows exactly who did it but of course the police dont have evidence and if she makes an issue of it it just got worse. A "good" day at her school was a day where no child got injured by another.

I have seen first hand the way some of these kids behave and a lot of people simply would not believe it, spitting, clawing, trying to stab people with pencils, urinating on other kids, biting ( drawing blood ) and even being sick on school books deliberately just so they can make a scene and get out of doing any work!

No doubt someone will respond with "well the teachers arent doing their job!! control the kids or expel them!" etc etc. Well the kids know that the teaching staff cant lay a bloody finger on them for fear of being sued or losing their job, the kids are actively told by their parents to put teachers in difficult situations as part of the little war they like to play against authority.

The mere suggestion of a teacher manhandling a small child is enough to ruin a career and the parents/kids know it. And if you expel kids at the rates needed to restore order the local goverment inspector is on the case and then the staff get replaced. The teachers in some areas are simply just trying to get by from day to day without being sacked or accused of something!

I could go on about the stuff ive seen but i suspect you know already. Some kids come from families that make the classic "scum" family look like saints. The kids from some of these families CAN be nice and really do try to work hard but its literally beaten out of them over time. And dont talk to me about social services, in the areas ive worked in they dont do a thing even when there is clear evidence of abuse.

Most schools ( primary anyway ) have at least one or two members of staff who monitor possible child abuse cases and are required to notify social services of suspected cases. In ALL the schools ive worked in these staff have told me that social services simply dont give a rats ass and ignore them on a daily basis. Seems local goverment workers dont get paid enough to care and actually do their job.

Now this is just my personal experiance from working in PRIMARY schools for 5 years, god only knows what secondary schools are like in bad areas.



The government would do better to put sterilising agents in the public water supply and make people pass an exam to have the antidote to have a child :cool:

I do though agree that SOME teachers are bad and they should be fired, but generally from my own experiance its kids who are simply unteachable. If teachers were allowed to punish and act as they did years ago a lot would be done to restore order. But take way the ability to control and punish and this is exacly what happens.

Unless you actually know the state of an area in which a school is based there is no way to judge the quality of the teaching other than be a fly on the wall and watch for yourself. OFSTED inspections are generally a waste of time, the kids are often on best behavior and the staff get penty of advance warning so that the bad ones can make it look good on the day. Even a layman like me can see that the best way to inspect schools would be for OFSTED to just turn up on the day and see how things really are.

Its a bit like when blair went to that hospital for a few days and commented on the nice friendly staff and clean room and such.... because they knew he was coming! Durrrrr


/well thats my big post for the day *phew*
 
Last edited:
^^ nice post, why do scum exist? I can never figure this out, why can't everyone be decent with a good sense of responsibility/morality? It's really not that hard.
 
^^ nice post, why do scum exist? I can never figure this out, why can't everyone be decent with a good sense of responsibility/morality? It's really not that hard.

Many reasons but often its simply a family thing. Some of the kids in these areas are 4th or 5th generation wasters. If you grow up knowing your parents, grandparents and great grandparents etc have never worked a day in their life then why should you?

In a normal working family you have values instilled into you from an early age, such as it being "normal" to goto work and pay your bills and pay your taxes and not steal from people. These kids never learn that so to them it is normal to rob and steal and claim every benefit under the sun.

I dont see a real solution to the problem until the parents are MADE to work. Maybe then in a couple of generations the work ethic will come back?
 
My mum is a teacher and has been punched and threatened with knives by, you wont believe this, someone in year 4 (9 years old). Its madness! Still, with some parents caring the schools havn't been too bad in the inner Oxfordshire areas.

Go to a big city with parental scallies and I can imagine things go to a whole new level of low. The teachers need more power and more protection from the law.
 
I got 9 A-C GCSE grades and i hardly showed up to school in the last few months, i just did a bit of cramming before the exam and i was fine. I can't believe kids struggle to get 5a-c grades, in my opinion you shouldn't be allowed to leave school unless you meet C grade in English and Maths
 
The problem is they are now 2nd and 3rd generation scum, They really need to sort out benefit fraud, that is the crux of it, by having more kids they get more money!
 
this is why they should bring back the cane in schools & the ability to smack your child on the botty


£400 million would buy a lot of bamboo
 
In fairness to Liverpool, there do seem to be mostly good schools achieving above national average results for GCSE and A-level.
 
Now as you scroll down you see a lot of 25% which shocked me, but it is not as bad as John Madejski Academy....5% get 5 GCSE's at C grade or above.

JMA is located in an extremely deprived area and is mainly a sports academy.
It was created to keep the kids off the streets and at least give them a chance at an education. It seems to be working well.
Better they are there and learning to play football etc than smashing up cars in and around Reading.

This is a perfect example of why school league tables are a waste of time as they don't compare like with like.
 
Back
Top Bottom