only reason i didnt recommend it was because you said a while ago that all the gigabyte boards are bad
No I didnt, I said some without Lucid etc

only reason i didnt recommend it was because you said a while ago that all the gigabyte boards are bad
No I didnt, I said some without Lucid etc![]()
ugh, right then, gigabyte boards back on the a-ok list (the ones with all the Z68 stuff of course)
then why the change? was it for a colour scheme or something?Still got it here in it's box, it still works. My brother seems to think he's having it.
I always heard that FSX rans better on nvidia GPU's.............Has this changed now ??A suggested spec with x-fire 6950 and three dell 22" and 2 Ilyama 17" (glass fronted) screens. Dell uses displayport, other screens use DVI-I
![]()
I always heard that FSX rans better on nvidia GPU's.............Has this changed now ??
nope, it hasnt. the only reason we're speccing ATI cards is because of the 5 monitor requirement and lack of SLI/crossfire support of flight sims (although i'm not sure why nkata recommended what he did)I always heard that FSX rans better on nvidia GPU's.............Has this changed now ??
nope, it hasnt. the only reason we're speccing ATI cards is because of the 5 monitor requirement and lack of SLI/crossfire support of flight sims (although i'm not sure why nkata recommended what he did)
@ the OP, what kind of money were you planning on spending on the monitors. going by your size request the logical candidates would be the BenQ G925HDA 18.5" for the bottom two screens, and either the Dell Ultrasharp U2211H 21.5" or the OcUK V-Line 221V2SB 22" which is a good phillips monitor.
main reason im asking is it will change how you wire everything up
*edit*
dumb question, but can you get an ATI graphics card to do the graphics and a cheap Nvidia graphics card to do Physx? if you can it would take a nice load off the processor thats for sure
I always heard that FSX rans better on nvidia GPU's.............Has this changed now ??
nope, it hasnt. the only reason we're speccing ATI cards is because of the 5 monitor requirement and lack of SLI/crossfire support of flight sims (although i'm not sure why nkata recommended what he did)
@ the OP, what kind of money were you planning on spending on the monitors. going by your size request the logical candidates would be the BenQ G925HDA 18.5" for the bottom two screens, and either the Dell Ultrasharp U2211H 21.5" or the OcUK V-Line 221V2SB 22" which is a good phillips monitor.
main reason im asking is it will change how you wire everything up
*edit*
dumb question, but can you get an ATI graphics card to do the graphics and a cheap Nvidia graphics card to do Physx? if you can it would take a nice load off the processor thats for sure
I think our overall budget was about £1400 top end. Do all of the above monitors rotate so they're on their side?
really? very surprised at that. it would work wonders for the millions of physics things that go on in flight simsWhat's the point, FSX doesn't have Physx.![]()
I think our overall budget was about £1400 top end. Do all of the above monitors rotate so they're on their side?
+-----------+-----------+-----------+
| | | |
| 22" #1 | 22" #2 | 22" #1 |
| | | |
| | | |
+-----------+-----------+-----------+
+---------+---------+
| | |
| 19" #1 | 19" #2 |
| | |
+---------+---------+
really? very surprised at that. it would work wonders for the millions of physics things that go on in flight sims