My 8 y/o freaked when he saw Voldemort on the back of Quirrell’s head
He stabs a guy in the face through his mouth and then proceeds to kill a security guard the same way through the eyeball. On numerous occasions he attempts to kill a kid with giant knife arms. There's a tremendous amount of machine guns and swearing from the mum including her stabbing a guy in the neck with a needle and the black dude bleeding out from numerous gun shot wounds.Tbh outside of a couple of the kills and the arm deglove there's not much in there that's any worse than you see in modern Marvel movies.
There's perhaps an argument for the tone of some scenes and how it's ultimately a lot darker by comparison, I mentioned earlier that I do think it depends on the child, but as a parent I'd assume you know your kid better than anyone on here.
He stabs a guy in the face through his eye ball and then proceeds to kill a security guard the same way. On numerous occasions he attempts to kill a kid with giant knife arms. There's a tremendous amount of machine guns and swearing from the mum including her stabbing a guy in the neck with a needle.
It's really not anything like a super hero movie.
Not a single person in this thread waited till 18 to play grand theft auto. I could bet my house on it!
In fairness I wouldn't let a 6 year old watch The Avengers either.
There was always one kid at school that you heard his parents made him watch horror movies and probably smoked fags right next to them. They were always the weird kid.
Lets agree to disagree, given the mass death and destruction in movies like Endgame.
It very much depends on the child and how they perceive things, some think more deeply than others. I also stated that outside of kill scenes and that there was an argument for tonality, I'm a big Terminator fan so rewatch the first two movies pretty frequently. They're not that bad beyond the first, there's a few modern big money movies which are arguably worse.
End game is PG-13. We've all become immune to what we are watching.
Like all such systems is scored on the lowest common age rating. It not based on a best case scenario.
I reckon there's parts of harry potter that's scary.
I agree, they probably have answered it already, but I think if they wanted a discussion specifically around Age Ratings and their suitability, then the question should be phrased more akin to "Should video age ratings be revised after so many years?" or "Would a previous PG rated films from the 1990's be suited to today's 6 year olds?" - that kinda thing.I would suggest if someone's asking a question, they've already answered their own question.
But people create topics to create discussion. Sometimes thats the reason itself.
I agree, they probably have answered it already, but I think if they wanted a discussion specifically around Age Ratings and their suitability, then the question should be phrased more akin to "Should video age ratings be revised after so many years?" or "Would a previous PG rated films from the 1990's be suited to today's 6 year olds?" - that kinda thing.
Wanted to come back to this.
I've never played it.. and I was a lot older then 18 when it was released.
I think people forget this used not be an issue. People didn't have any access to games like that. Same with movies.
‘You get desensitised to it’: how social media fuels fear of violence
Young people in Birmingham attest that violent content on apps is having a real-world impactwww.theguardian.com
Don't watch violence on your screens and have a happy life.