Poll: 9/11. A Poll.

Were the 9/11 attacks a result of ..

  • The US Government caught napping.

    Votes: 512 68.5%
  • A conspiracy by the US Government and others.

    Votes: 235 31.5%

  • Total voters
    747
dmpoole said:
And its so ironic that you can't see that its you doing it.

no it would be if what you are saying is correct - however, I've answered points with my opinion - purely my opinion - answering points that were raised, and iirc have never said that anyone else's opinion is wrong, - if what I say doesn't match what you believe that is very different to belittling someone because they don't agree with you - which you do consistently.

The closest I have got to doing so is the specsavers comment.

You act as if anyone who doesn't agree with you is an idiot - or at least that's how you treat them. All you've got to do is look back over this thread and we'll see who's patronising and demeaning to anyone who believes differently to them. And guess what - it's not me.
 
kitten_caboodle said:
You act as if anyone who doesn't agree with you is an idiot - or at least that's how you treat them.

Theres one idiot in this thread and the rest are delusional (the idiot isn't you).

Delusion

A false belief that a person maintains in spite of obvious proof or evidence to the contrary
 
dmpoole said:
Delusion

A false belief that a person maintains in spite of obvious proof or evidence to the contrary

The whole point is people have given evidence to the contrary of your belief which you continually ignore and in a way put your hands over your ears and go "I'm not listening!!! You are wrong and I'm right" so you are in fact delusional by your own definition.
 
LeoWyatt said:
The whole point is people have given evidence to the contrary of your belief which you continually ignore and in a way put your hands over your ears and go "I'm not listening!!! You are wrong and I'm right" so you are in fact delusional by your own definition.
Evidence to suggest that the 9/11 attacks were a work of the US government? I'm all ears...
 
LeoWyatt said:
The whole point is people have given evidence to the contrary of your belief which you continually ignore and in a way put your hands over your ears and go "I'm not listening!!! You are wrong and I'm right" so you are in fact delusional by your own definition.

Wrong - none of the TFH's have given any proof that the American Govt planned and executed 9/11.
 
Al Vallario said:
Evidence to suggest that the 9/11 attacks were a work of the US government? I'm all ears...

Here comes the sidekick now!

The point is you aren't all ears, you just poo poo whatever people say contrary to your opinion.

Infact I've just been reading this and it is a nice collection of other theories and what you could consider evidence to support the "TFH" arguments.
 
Last edited:
this thread is total Bull. The options are nothing but negative. anyone in their right mind knows that the attack was nothing more than an act of terrorism, maybe they didnt agree with the US ideas, but there was no need for what happened.

I cant vote in this ridiculous waste of a thread because i agree with neither of your options

morons
 
Hedge said:
this thread is total Bull. The options are nothing but negative. anyone in their right mind knows that the attack was nothing more than an act of terrorism, maybe they didnt agree with the US ideas, but there was no need for what happened.

I cant vote in this ridiculous waste of a thread because i agree with neither of your options

morons

don't let the door hit your arse on the way out.
 
kitten_caboodle said:
don't let the door hit your arse on the way out.

Sorry but this thread has always been about what the dons have thought, if not there would be a million options on what happened, I wouldn't give grief to those who think differently to you wouldn't be very nice behaviour tho.

KaHn
 
Last edited:
KaHn said:
Sorry but this thread has always been about what the dons have thought, if not there would be a million options on what happened, I would give grief to those who think differently to you would be very nice behaviour tho.

KaHn

sorry mate I don't really understand that :/

Von's not a don? What's the last bit mean?
 
kitten_caboodle said:
sorry mate I don't really understand that :/

Von's not a don? What's the last bit mean?

My post has been changed, no I am not having a go at von as it is not him who changes the vote, he has always stated if anyone has a better option that provide it, a few have been shot down by dons here as they do not think they are "viable".

KaHn

edit; I for one do not think the options given are suitable, what if it was the north koreans? Or the chinese? everything is viable but people have different opinion so a poll should reflect that and not bottle neck people to a certian view.
 
KaHn said:
Really?

KaHn

yes. It's got absolutely nothing to do with his opinion, more the fact that he swept in, bitched about the content of the thread and the posters, and then finished off with 'Morons'. If he thinks little people under the ground did it, that's his opinion and as you'll see if you read back a few pages, I support anyone to voice their opinion, whether they agree with me or not. I just ask that they show me the same courtesy in return - when they don't, that's what annoys me.

'Morons' was hardly a thoughtful comment that added anything to the debate. Hence I was glad to see the back of him. There's really no need to be rude, t'internet or not.
 
kitten_caboodle said:

Yes there is, to be honest, in this day and age all any one ever sees is grief or abuse, his comments were totally viable towards what have came before them, no one and I mean not one don, has tried to change the vote to accommodate those who don’t agree with it, but that seems to be ok, if someone gets annoyed at this its almost taken as sacrilege and is taken as not " a thoughtful comment".

KaHn
 
Back
Top Bottom