9/11 - Controlled demolition?

Nicola said:
you should read more then
Click to expand...
From what you've said so far in this thread, I'm afraid Sleepy is right on in that you really don't have a clue.

I'd highly recommend you read the thread (or just the last few pages to get an idea of what is being discussed) before commenting further. For your own sake...
 
Nicola said:
ive tried to get ppl thinking ,hasnt worked lets try this then what evidence do we have that it was hijackers.
and dont attack me just answer the question, or dont
Click to expand...

Hmm, let me have a go, perhaps Al Qaeda actually admitted they did it several times and thats besides all the other evidence.
9/11 is the greatest victory in the Al Qaeda calendar.

singist said:
so try not to be quite such a **** in future and accept that things "may" not be as we have all been told.
Click to expand...

I'm really surprised at you.
You seriously think that at 9:28am in front of possibly 1000's of people the US Govt flew a missile into the Pentagon?
 
dmpoole said:
I'm really surprised at you.
You seriously think that at 9:28am in front of possibly 1000's of people the US Govt flew a missile into the Pentagon?
Click to expand...

dam if 1000's of people were watching the pentagon at exactly 9:28am i'd be very worried if i was the gov :D
 
Al Vallario said:
From what you've said so far in this thread, I'm afraid Sleepy is right on in that you really don't have a clue.
I'd highly recommend you read the thread (or just the last few pages to get an idea of what is being discussed) before commenting further. For your own sake...
Click to expand...


mkultra
psyops
media control

i suggest u look into these before u call me cluless (probly take at least a year for you to understand these topics properly )

and yes i should have read the hole thread but is the topic basicly not about weather 911 was an inside job or terrorist attack?

dmpoole said:
Hmm, let me have a go, perhaps Al Qaeda actually admitted they did it several times and thats besides all the other evidence.
9/11 is the greatest victory in the Al Qaeda calendar.
Click to expand...



and who sponsers them?
 
dmpoole said:
You seriously think that at 9:28am in front of possibly 1000's of people the US Govt flew a missile into the Pentagon?
Click to expand...

I'd thought that the missile theory had been disproven anyway?

The generator near the crash site was moved towards the building by something fairly big and fairly heavy....kind of like a ~250000lb Boeing 757 maybe? Had it been a missile:

a) if it had hit the generator it would have detonated rather than continue to make that hole in the building.
b) if it missed the generator then the explosion would have tilted the generator away from the building, not towards it.

Add to that the engine, the wheel rim, the parts painted in Boeing green primer, everything else they found there....it was a plane.

Nicola said:
mkultra
psyops
media control

i suggest u look into these before u call me cluless (probly take at least a year for you to understand these topics properly)
Click to expand...

Again with the arrogance.....
 
Nicola said:
mkultra
psyops
media control

i suggest u look into these before u call me cluless (probly take at least a year for you to understand these topics properly )

and yes i should have read the hole thread but is the topic basicly not about weather 911 was an inside job or terrorist attack?

and who sponsers them?
Click to expand...


You are officially the weirdest person on here.
BTW, I'm a Gemini because you obviously believe in astrology too.
 
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&hl=en

if your interested in the whole conspiracy thing.

I watched, its good and makes you think. But personally, whatever did or did not happen it simply will not bring back those who died. Perhaps the government did do it to themselves, perhaps they didn't. I don't really want to know. Its bad enough as it of what happened without having it made worse by being an inside job.
 
Gman said:
The problem is even though the Pentagon was reinforced concrete, images have been released that show that the plane penetrated a few of the inner sections. You can even make out the shape of similar width to the planes fuselage going through the buildings.

therefore no way did what happened on that plane video happen to the plane that hit the pentagon.
Click to expand...
surely as the Pentagon was indeed made of reinforced conrete the same effects would've happened to the airliner albeit in a smaler was as we're comparing a building to a solid block of concrete?
i think the point is the plane will have suffered the same type of destruction although it will have been to a much lesser degree.
only wing tips remained of that Phantom whereas some of the airliner will indeed have atomised.
 
Al Vallario said:
If I had a penny for every time that link has been posted...

It has been torn to shreds, mind you. Yet it still shocks me how it pulls so many people in. Scrap this MKULTRA rubbish, the CIA should hire the people who made that steaming pile of...
Click to expand...
^ Leading on from that (Went for the edit button but it appears I hit quote instead)...

I just watched the final 15 minutes of "Loose Change" again (I've seen it before, a long time ago), and I'm further taken aback by the fact that people buy into this rubbish. The man touting the Scholars for Truth rubbish being interview on FOX News... words simply cannot describe. What an obnoxious, arrogant, ill-informed jerk. "We now know the towers were bought down by controlled demolition." I simply cannot believe that this idiot was given airtime on a national news channel. Words fail me, really...
 
Gman said:
yep true, question is why would someone who believed that what he was doing was the will of god mask his identity, if they truly believed they were doing it for god then they would be proud of what they where doing and wouldn't hide there identiy.
Click to expand...
aren't those "men" that have commited all those beheadings we've all seen doing the will of god while masking their faces as well?

or is it because they're also cowards?
 
Last edited:
Nicola said:
.... i like to stay in the middle and look at both sides of the argument before i made my mind up ,and to understand 911 you need to understand the history of goverments which is documented but you have to dig deep to find it
Click to expand...

Thats's totally correct, to be impartial is the best that any of us can do.

On 15 February 1898 the USS Maine was blown up by the Americans to spark the US intervention to remove Spain from Cuba. At the time there were also inconclusive theories as to the cause but conclusive evidence released from US archives has since shown that the US did in fact order the battleship to be destroyed resulting in the death of 266 of its own men.

To defend the Medias accepted view on the whole 9-11 thing seems to me to be a step too far. It’s like that scene in Jaws when the mayor is urging folks to go in the water because he believes they will be safe.

Think of it this way most of us are aware of the date of the 9-11 disaster but how many of us truthfully, without Googling know the particulars concerning the Nagasaki and Hiroshima disasters, which you would have to agree would rank higher in any list of human atrocities.

In scientific experiments, results dictate the validity of any given theory being tested. Only then can a rational conclusion be made. If we just take the time to observe the results caused by 9-11 i.e. restriction of the public’s movement’s erosion of human freedoms, more and more cameras, ID’s and retina scans on the horizon etc… Who do these results best serve?....You make your own conclusions.
 
I hate to drag this thread up again after a month of silence, but I just found a series of videos which are quite interesting. Before you start groaning and sighing, it's not more "zomg Alex Jones 4 prezidant!!!" rubbish...

The videos are from a show on the "Democracy Now" television channel in which the editor/narrator and researcher behind the "documentary" Loose Change (which has been mentioned to death in this thread) are pitted against two people from Popular Mechanics who have released a book debunking many of the conspiracy theories relating to 9/11.

Check out the first part (See the 'related' box on the right for the remaining parts) and see what you think. I'm currently on part 3, and although I'm fully aware of the old saying "You shouldn't judge a book by its cover," looking at the people representing the two sides, and the way they debate the topic... lets just say I know who I would trust more ;)
 
just watched the first 30 seconds and nearly laughing here at the woman introducing it.

You just wanna say "and breath......."
 
Oh my the lose change guys are **** who don't know anything.

They say that no plane hit the pentagon, then refer to a stand down order relating to the plane and evidence the plane was being tracked. There so stupid, they can't say there no plane, then turn around and say it was being tracked.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom