9/11 - Controlled demolition?

eh, what u talking about the world trade centres are still standing, they just got a new government cloaking device on em and cgi was used on tv to show them collapsing. if u watch carefully, u can see neo flying around the sky as well.
 
Mana said:
eh, what u talking about the world trade centres are still standing, they just got a new government cloaking device on em and cgi was used on tv to show them collapsing. if u watch carefully, u can see neo flying around the sky as well.

Nah mate you've got it all wrong.

In some clips you can see senator Palpatine AKA Darth Sidious lying in the window with Mace Windu holding him at sabre point. Vibrations from his ridiculous scream of "INFINITE POWAAAAAH!" caused the trade centre towers to collapse.

You're all nubs.
 
Overlag said:
(however WTC7 WAS, and always has been said to have been a controlled collapse due to the fact it was so badly damaged that it would not be repairable).

Can you provide any evidence for this statement? WTC7 collapsed around 5pm on 9/11 how on earth could they have rigged a building to be demolished the same day. Which demolition company was called in at the drop of a hat to in do this?

The building was badly damaged and still on fire when it collapsed how would the demolition crew be aloud inside to start rigging it with explosives? It takes hours to prepare a building for demolition.

Your living in a fantasy world.

All the buildings fell due to damage, the conspiracy lies in the hijack Wargames being run that morning which confused the airforce response and more importantly the money given to Atta by the ISI.
 
Last edited:
Just seen the footage and i believe that the so called 'Explosions' that people say are caused by explosives were not. When a building of this size collapses parts of it are going to explode out. All this pressure has to be released. This is what we are seeing in the footage.

There may have been extra 'Explosions' going off but i believe they were probably other things igniting like, gas pockets, Plane parts etc etc.

Also, one thing that is in the video, if you look closely, is George Bush running into Tower one in a loin cloth. covered in camoflage paint, with a knife in one hand and he is shouting out "I WANT MY BLOW UP DOLL OF BLAIR BACK!!"
 
Last edited:
75 Academics Swell 9/11 Conspiracy Movement

A newly-formed movement called Scholars for 9/11 Truth is challenging the official story about the September 11th attacks, attracting academics who include a physicist, a retired philosophy professor, as well as Princeton and Stanford elites.

They have produced books and self-published papers which claim that the "World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions" and say that 9/11 was allowed to occur or was orchestrated by the government.

Daniel Orr, a Princeton Ph.D and retired from University of Illinois, is one academic who is convinced the twin towers and Tower 7 were demolished. Judy Wood, a former assistant professor of mechanical engineering, concludes the same.

http://edition.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/08/06/sept11.theories.ap/index.html
 
dmpoole said:
75 Academics Swell 9/11 Conspiracy Movement

A newly-formed movement called Scholars for 9/11 Truth is challenging the official story about the September 11th attacks, attracting academics who include a physicist, a retired philosophy professor, as well as Princeton and Stanford elites.


Just a bunch of idiots with diffrent motivation to blame the us goverment. Theres plenty of evidance to show the planes crashed into the towers, The resulting heat melted the metal structure and it collapsed. I have not seen any hard evidance that shows anything even remoptley suggesting it could have been a controlled explosion.
 
Also, with the force those planes hit the pillars etc inside the building no wonder it collapsed!

Controlled Demolition! What a load of rubbish! Typical US fantasy again.
 
Church Enters 9/11 Conspiracy Debate

The publishing arm of the Presbyterian Church in the US has released a book entitled 'Christian Faith and the Truth behind 9/11: A Call to Arms' which blames President Bush for organising the 9/11 attacks.

In the publication the author David Ray Griffin describes the US as the world's chief embodiment of demonic power. He goes on to say that the Twin Towers were toppled by demolition and the military stood down while the attacks were carried out.

Griffin, a professor at California's Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University, goes on to claim that such 'false-flag attacks' are commonplace in history, used by governments to gather support for war.

http://story.irishsun.com/p.x/ct/9/id/f53507b34994070a/cid/2411cd3571b4f088/
 
MookJong said:
Can you provide any evidence for this statement? WTC7 collapsed around 5pm on 9/11 how on earth could they have rigged a building to be demolished the same day. Which demolition company was called in at the drop of a hat to in do this?

The building was badly damaged and still on fire when it collapsed how would the demolition crew be aloud inside to start rigging it with explosives? It takes hours to prepare a building for demolition.

Your living in a fantasy world.
Exactly. If I recall correctly WTC7 also contained a command center bunker which had a 6,000 gallon fuel tank to run generators. It's also believed that there were a number of additional fuel tanks located elsewhere in the building owned by tenants for the same purpose. Although WTC7 was not damaged much by the collapse of WTC1 and 2, the resulting fires caused extensive damage, and this is what brought the building down.

A lot of conspiracy theorists breed off the following quote from Larry Silverstein:

"I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

However, Silverstein has since said that his decision to "pull it" was to pull the firefighters out of the building — at that stage there were fires all over the building raging out of control — as it was a lost cause. Besides, why would he discuss a top secret plot to carry out a controlled demolition of the building with the fire department commander?
 
theres only one person i trust in a situation like this

Maddox said:
For anyone interested in a point-by-point debunking of some of the most popular conspiracy theories out there (like the fact that steel melts at 1525° C, and although jet fuel burns only at 825° C, it doesn't have to burn hot enough to melt to cause the buildings to collapse, since steel loses 50% of its strength at 648 ° C), .......

if you want to read it all, just google for maddox's report on 9/11
 
people will believe whatever they see and read i should imagine.. and with so many 'ideas' and such like floating around i don't think anyone on this earth know's the whole truth

and as for me... i just dont care. same goes for politics and the like
 
Back
Top Bottom