9/11 Tape to be Released

How come there is no other video footage of a low plane in Washington DC, the capitol of the United States of America.

It doesnt wash with me, until I actually see footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon I will still think it was foul play by a goverment sector.
 
Doohickey said:
There are supposedly eye-witnesses that heard and/or saw a missle though *shrug*

Just playing devil's advocate. :)

Explain the Black box, Landing gear, Chunks of engines, the wheels.

Last time i checked missles dont come with those :)
 
Out of interest, what could/would convince you that it was a plane, besides actually having been there at the time?
 
Mujja said:
Why can't the posters who believe this is real show the same respect to the doubters as you are shown.
Because those who are doubters are explaining it away with psuedo-intellectual, subjective, biased and totally un-informed "but it can't possibly be true" crap. (mostly)

There's absolutely no point to these discussions unless people can pinpoint credible sources. I don't think anyone here has the expertise to say a definitive yes or no.

The argument really will go round and round and round anyway.

Some people even believe Elvis is dead.
 
Zip said:
Thats because it seems you arnt taking in anything that we have said

So what new evidence has come to light today then. Before you video was released you said we would see the evidence atlast to put all the conspiracies to rest. I didn't believe it was a plane yesterday and I don't today.

Like I said, if the collapse of the twin towers and building 7 didn't look rigged then the pentagon might have looked believable.

Anyway, that's it from me. There have already been lots of threads about 9/11 on this forum. And todays video changes nothing.
 
Rich_L said:
Out of interest, what could/would convince you that it was a plane, besides actually having been there at the time?

/People that dont believe us mode

Video evedence of the place flying low over washington and into the pentagone.

/People that dont believe us mode off.


/People that believe what i do mode

Here is your video, I told you it wasnt fake.

/People that believe what i do mode off


/People that dont believe us mode

That video is clearly made up and fake done by the govenment to get us believe what they tell us.

/People that dont believe us mode off


I dont think there would be convincing them at all
 
Mujja said:
So what new evidence has come to light today then. Before you video was released you said we would see the evidence atlast to put all the conspiracies to rest. I didn't believe it was a plane yesterday and I don't today.

Like I said, if the collapse of the twin towers and building 7 didn't look rigged then the pentagon might have looked believable.

Anyway, that's it from me. There have already been lots of threads about 9/11 on this forum. And todays video changes nothing.

Ok how does it look rigged exactly?
Also that whole page Rich posted earlyer.
Maybe your should go read it all word by word
 
Rich_L said:
Out of interest, what could/would convince you that it was a plane, besides actually having been there at the time?

Footage of the plane being low and striking the Pentagon, It has to be clear and that you can actually tell its a plane carrying people.

Somthing along the lines of the guy who filmed the WTC (his mate is leaning on something and hes looking across the street but hes in shot and the camera is pointing right at the towers) and you can see from the ground the plane hitting the tower clearly.
 
Last edited:
People just want to see the truth and weather a plane hit the pentagon or not there's still a lot to be explained so until then there will be much conspiracy surrounding it.
 
Rich_L said:
Out of interest, what could/would convince you that it was a plane, besides actually having been there at the time?

Being on the plane myself ;)

Harley had a good rep on these forums and I can see no reason why he would lie. However some of the theories out there are very convincing.
 
Beansprout said:

What is that video supposed to prove. The F4 Phantom doesn't have huge engines hanging under its wings. It also has smaller swept back wings. More like a missle than a Boeing. Also it was running along the ground when it hit the wall. The Boeing would have been descending onto the Pentagon as the satellite image I linked to earlier shows there was not enough clear space in front of the wall for a plane that big to come in perpendicular to the wall.
 
cheets64 said:
How come there is no other video footage of a low plane in Washington DC, the capitol of the United States of America.

It doesnt wash with me, until I actually see footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon I will still think it was foul play by a goverment sector.

How many CCTV cameras in the U.K. are aimed in the air?.
I'll answer that one, not many, especially the fixed cameras that are mainly in use - the sort that watch specific points of interest such as doorways, carpark entrances etc.

It's pure luck any caught it at all in the U.S. as they apparently don't have anything like the numbers we have in the U.K..
Add to that the fact that a low flying aircraft will be in sight for a lot less time than a high flying one (something some military aircraft take advantage of), and you're not exactly going to have much chance for it to be picked up.

Even in London the chances are a plane flying close to the ground probably wouldn't get caught on many cameras, and we've got tens of thousands of the things all over the place (many more than the U.S. used to have).


Personally I give the member who saw the Pentagon crash from the cemetary a lot more credence than the conspiracy theorists.
 
Rich_L said:
They did.

This page does a good job of summarising the available evidence. Of course it could all be doctored and made up though.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html


With evidence and analysis like that I dont see why people are still debating this. The new footage doesnt prove or disprove anything to me. That link above however, eliminated the small amount of doubt I had in my mind about the Pentagon.

IMHO, this issue is closed. A plane, hyjacked my Al Q terrorists was flown with luck into the side of the pentagon. All the evidence is there to support it if not prove it. As for poor pilots flying the plane so low so fast, simply put, it was luck. They only had to do it once and they did it. No one places doubt on the score of a sports game when a player shoots a hail mary shot in the final seconds of the game from half way down the field/court to win but all it was was luck that he made the shot. I dont see why people cant accept that those terrorists got lucky?

Thank you Rich_L, saving the website for anyone who doubts what happened.
 
Some of you lot on here make me sad how you can keep such nonsense up.

One question for you -
If it was all done by the USA Govt and they fired missiles or drones etc - what really happened to the hundreds of people who lost their lives in the pretend planes?
Perhaps thats another conspiracy where 1000's of Americans have been paid to make up old friends and family.


On the BBC News tonight a reporter said it doesn't silence the conspiracy theorists because they pick holes in anything and their numbers are very few.
He ought to log on to Overclockers.
Show some bloody respect for the dead because this is getting beyond pathetic.
 
Back
Top Bottom