9/11 Tape to be Released

Sp!ke said:
Interesting how conspiracy theorists ignore RELIABLE eye witness evidence. I know who you are referring to fatiain and I would trust his eyesight and integrity without question.

Oh btw ffs dont let any of this lot near Neil Armstrong, he's got a cracking right hook :D

:rolleyes:

S
Click to expand...

You mean Buzz Aldrin got a cracking right hook.
 
Treefrog said:
Hmmm. That explanation certainly clears up a few points.
Cheers Rich :)
Click to expand...

Agreed
That was a very good post of his.

Any of the people that think it was a conspiricy bother reading the link that Rich posted?
After you read that and look at the pictures try to say there is no plane
 
Just been looking at an aerial photo of the Pentagon. This picture shows where the plane hit the west wall.

If you look at the first picture again I can't see how a plane travelling so fast could have come in so low and hit the wall at 90 degrees. There is an elevated highway in the way and some other small buildings and lots of trees
 
Last edited:
Mujja said:
Just been looking at an aerial photo of the Pentagon. This picture shows where the plane hit the west wall.

If you look at the first picture again I can't see how a plane travelling so fast could have come in so low and hit the wall at 90 degrees. There is an elevated highway in the way and some other small buildings and lots of trees
Click to expand...
lol i was doing the exact same thing then and came up with the same conclusion :P
 
Zip said:
To prove my point just watch the video.
You see small fragments of shrapnel land just infront of the camera.
And thats just a bloody plane!!!
Click to expand...

Yes. more shrapnel comes from a missile than from a 757(right plane?)
 
Last edited:
georges said:
Yes. more shrapnel comes from a missile than from a 757(right no?)
Click to expand...

Not Shrapnel from the missile it self but shrapnel from the reinforced concrete it would have just blown to bits
 
cheets64 said:
The pictures on that site are confusing me.

http://69.57.144.30/ats/pentagon757/your-own-evidence.jpg

Why is the brick work different to the other photos of the front of the pentagon, Also no how did that sign stay on in the massive blast?
Click to expand...

It's a concentrated blast through that secion of wall. It's like saying why is that brick just above the sign still there, probably because it didn't get the force of the impact / explosion, and that it's also probably bolted to the wall.
 
I haven't read through the whole thread but I have just watched the video on the BBC site.

Conclusion? It's still open as far as I'm concerned. This footage showed nothing new, although it did show an interesting object coming in from the right of the frame just before the explosion. It was a nose of something and it didn't look big enough to be a plane. More like a missile.
 
I can see how a light aluminium wing could fold etc but the two engines attached to the wings and weighing several tons would have made some nice holes by themselves.
 
ballistic said:
goma01.gif
Click to expand...

ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL!!! OMFG LMAO! :D Ballistic... you're a f'legend mate!
 
fatiain said:
There is an ex member here that SAW THE PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON.
Click to expand...

There is another forum i frequent that has a couple of people who saw it hit, it flew over one of them as he sat in his car on the way to work.

Obviously, they are part of a CIA black operation. In fact, maybe i am as well

*speaks into cuff*
 
singist said:
I can see how a light aluminium wing could fold etc but the two engines attached to the wings and weighing several tons would have made some nice holes by themselves.
Click to expand...
Not in a reinforced concrete wall with granite cladding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom