9/11 Tape to be Released

Mujja said:
Turned to dust :confused:
Even a missle will leave recognisable fragments behind after taking out a whole building. A passport survived the twin towers explosion and you're saying the wings turned to dust?

Watching the video zip posted, the wings ar clearly still intact. Seeing as the plane that hit the pentagon was larger, I would have expected there to be some form of wreckage from the wings. :/
 
Mujja said:
Turned to dust :confused:
Even a missle will leave recognisable fragments behind after taking out a whole building. A passport survived the twin towers explosion and you're saying the wings turned to dust?

Have a look at the video i posted and you will see what i mean.
Not dust exactly but very very small fragments
 
Mikol said:
Watching the video zip posted, the wings ar clearly still intact. Seeing as the plane that hit the pentagon was larger, I would have expected there to be some form of wreckage from the wings. :/

The wing tips survived because they broke off because i think from the looks of things the planes wingspan was wider then the wall
 
cheets64 said:
Are these the stills from the new or the old Video.

1.jpg
why do they say "september 12th" :confused:
 
cheets64 said:
Where is the plane, all I can see is an explosion.

Can someone post the new video on here?

If you cant see the plane try and slow down the frames. It would be moving pretty fast.
Possibly too fast for the naked eye
 
Haha, the Sky reporter is a joke.

Two angles, one of which is zoomed in a little.

"Can see a nose cone", "bit hard to see" she says.

Perhaps we can zoom in :confused:

Lies, lies.
 
The real question is....

Why not release footage that shows an actual plane? They must have some footage that shows this, they've got plently of footage of the subsequent explosion. It would as so many people have said, "shut the theorists up".

Is it not obvious why they can't release it?
 
cheets64 said:
rofl, the sky footage you can see a little white missle shaped object in 1 frame, utter joke.

Are the camers just set there not moving?
Or are they following it?
If they are set there you do relieze how fast the plane would have been moving and how it would be more of a blure unless they used super slow mo cameras?
 
cheets64 said:
rofl, the sky footage you can see a little white missle shaped object in 1 frame, utter joke.
any body fancy posting a link to this stuff :-/

been searching the Sky News site and can't find a damned thing
 
Zip said:
Are the camers just set there not moving?
Or are they following it?
If they are set there you do relieze how fast the plane would have been moving and how it would be more of a blure unless they used super slow mo cameras?


Its set, it looks like its from the left of the old video its near enough the same angle, the white thing looks very small and its very blured.

I am not convinced.

nikebee said:
any body fancy posting a link to this stuff :-/

been searching the Sky News site and can't find a damned thing

I cant find it on the internet, and no other news channel is showing it atm.
 
Mulder said:
The real question is....

Why not release footage that shows an actual plane? They must have some footage that shows this, they've got plently of footage of the subsequent explosion. It would as so many people have said, "shut the theorists up".

Is it not obvious why they can't release it?

Apparantly the video camera on the highway wasn't working, and the ones confiscated at the gas station and hotels didn't capture the impact (yet tha tfootage hasn't been released).

Also the Pentagon only has it would appear video camera that record every half second. So pretty much the place that should be one of the most secure places in the world has crappy cameras. Even the damn media companies have better cameras than at the Pentagon. SO pretty much the U.S can have stealth planes, put man in to space and have some awesom emilitary tech, but yet still has crappy cameras. Hmmm...
 
Zip said:
Will all the people that think this is all a conspiracy please shut the **** up :mad:
Lots of people died because of these acts.
I think bush did the right thing by going into Afghanistan and Iraq.

All this conspiracy theory gets on my goat.
How about some respect for the people that lost their lives in the incident and going to war?
The only thing that'll shut people up is evidence, like undoctored video footage.
Yes, a lot of people died because of these acts; and more and more are dying every day - British, Afghanis, Americans, Iraqis. There are also a lot of people who are changing their mind about the invasions being the right thing to do. I think that Bush's reason for the military activity is not the safeguarding of America's shores, or wanting to spread their version of democracy, or to eradicate terrorism, but is more to do with taking control of a geopolitically strategic area with essential mineral resources.

Whether the appalling loss of life that happened on Sept. 11th was due to inept but lucky hijackers who managed to hoodwink the biggest intelligence agency in the world or to the US Govt knowing but allowing/helping it to happen is not yet definite.

But while the question still exists I think it would be disrespectful to those who died not to attempt to find out what really happened that day.
 
cheets64 said:
Its set, it looks like its from the left of the old video its near enough the same angle, the white thing looks very small and its very blured.

I am not convinced.
*smacks head on table*

links please :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom