9/11
- Thread starter peteyr
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 4,255
- Location
- North Sea
Called it.
That was not what was asked for though was it. You called me a "fool" and said I talked "crap" because I asked you why that statement didn't have to meet its own criteria. Telling me what that statement is doesn't actually answer the question posed.
The statement you posted had no evidence to support it. It was an assertion (see earlier definition) that by its own logic we have no choice but to reject. The only other alternative would be that it was self-evident (I think this is reasonable and what I believe). However, if it is acceptable to accept things as self-evident then we can reasonably come to the conclusion that in all likelihood to some degree the massive US intelligence service and those of its allies did have some degree of knowledge that an attack was going to happen especially as there have been several equally serious historical precedents of similar happenings and intelligence knowledge with subsequent failings.
And I am not trolling you. I am challenging the flippancy of the throwaway comment that I don't think you fully thought through.
It should be and I'll say no more to Sliver on that previous point other than this part which I do think has merit:
"we can reasonably come to the conclusion that in all likelihood to some degree the massive US intelligence service and those of its allies did have some degree of knowledge that an attack was going to happen especially as there have been several equally serious historical precedents of similar happenings and intelligence knowledge with subsequent failings."
What we have found is that the warning have always been there for these acts. They just haven't been heeded. That is very different from consciously ignored which is not what this chap seems to be suggesting.
There is bound to be another 9/11 post in a day or two anyway so may as well stick with this one.
You have to be careful with heart attacks there is the potential to get poorly. If that is the case you will not be as fit as you once were and therefore you will devolve.
Still 1 page for me, man sized pages or gtfo!
Could an amateur pilot who has only trained on single engine and twin engine planes fly a passenger jet into a building with that level of accuracy? Not one amateur pilot but three managed to achieve head on collisions. The footage of the second plane shows it only making one correcting flight adjustment before impacting. Isn't that rather too skillful for someone who hasn't flown that type of plane before?
Then there is the confirmed reports of traces of thermite being discovered in the rubble. how did it get there? Doesn't the fact that the towers both collapsed floor by floor on top of each other resemble a controlled explosion?
There is most definitely some things we are not being told.
Obviously not all the theorist can be right, some say no planes, some say military planes, some say drones, advanced secret weapons etc. but I wouldn't dismiss them out of hand either. Some could hold a few pieces of the puzzle, like why did al qaeda not just poo through the White House letterbox?
Last edited:
Skyscraper fell down on itself. What they are designed to do. Wouldn't want one of them toppling over sideways in a city like NY. The 'explosions' you see as the building falls.. Pressure. Or the floors that are dedicated to servers/ aircon units/ general building infrastructure.
Controlled explosion. Seen how long it take to set up a controlled explosion for houses, small flats? Let alone a skyscraper...
Inb4 insurance job though.
These threads deliver. All the weed smoking, tin foil wearing basement dwellers come out to play. Like flies to ****.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 4,255
- Location
- North Sea
80 posts per page yo! We all know which way this thread is going to go. The swivel-eyed loons will emerge and the tin-foil shall flow.
It's not like there isn't precedence
Designed to do that when damaged due to earthquake.
Oh wow, you're describing yourself perfectly there, and you can't even see it.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 5,510
- Location
- Worthington-on-sea
Oh yea, a guy who polled 5th and 4th in the 2008 & 2012 Republican Pimaries respectively, I'm sure they told him loads of national secrets...!
Soldato
- Joined
- 10 May 2004
- Posts
- 13,056
- Location
- Sunny Stafford
Ahhh, the 9/11 conspiracies - that was a great South Park episode. "Mystery of the Urinal Deuce" if memory serves 
Oh dear, idiots out on mass like normal.
It scares them, they like to be different, they are paranoid.
Then there's the brain doesn't understand so it takes what it knows and applies it. there's a proper term for this but I can't remember it. Which explains the controlled demolition nonsense.
It scares them, they like to be different, they are paranoid.
Then there's the brain doesn't understand so it takes what it knows and applies it. there's a proper term for this but I can't remember it. Which explains the controlled demolition nonsense.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 5,510
- Location
- Worthington-on-sea
In hindsight you'd imagine that a lot of the pieces of the puzzle were there but the intelligence services hadn't joined them up. Like looking at scores of jumbled up jigsaws, the pieces are there but it takes a lot of work to put all the right bits together.
- Status