A plane on a conveyor belt

Status
Not open for further replies.
How can there be any forward movement if the belt matches the plane's speed. It takes off because there is airflow. This airflow is due to the fact the engines are producing thrust and keeping the plane from moving backwards along the belt. Because it's moving, although not relative to the ground, there is airflow and therefore vertical component to wings i.e lift.

You can't be serious! So a plane on a treadmill generates air movement (aka wind)?

The wheels are not fixed, they spin with the movement of the treadmill. The plane is then free to move forwards at whatever speed it likes - the engines provide the thrust to move forwards and it then takes off.
 
The plane is stationary relative to the ground as the conveyor belt matches the plane's speed. The plane is however overcoming gravity and drag when it does take off.

The conveyor belt is the length of a runway remember...
The Plane isn't trying to stay on or match the speed of the conveyor belt
The conveyor belt matches the speed of the wheels NOT the plane

The plane hurtles along the belt and takes off with the wheels spinning twice as fast as normal.

Get it? Got it? Sorted?
 
A cake that was thrown away I would've eaten that!:mad:

"... once filming was completed, we would have liked to have offered the Fabia cake to local charities, schools and hospitals. Unfortunately, as the car had been under studio lights for several days, it may have posed a health and safety risk if eaten and we were therefore unable to do this.

It was decided that as we were unable to donate the cake to charity, the cake was instead recycled. It was taken away and composted, so that it could return to the natural environment. The cake was taken to a place called the East London Community Recycling Project in Clapton. The project has been set up to provide local residents and members with quality compost for use on their gardens or allotments."

:(

Anyway, back on topic...
 
How can there be any forward movement if the belt matches the plane's speed. It takes off because there is airflow. This airflow is due to the fact the engines are producing thrust and keeping the plane from moving backwards along the belt. Because it's moving, although not relative to the ground, there is airflow and therefore vertical component to wings i.e lift.

Please please please read the thread - we've covered this and several other "issues" already!

/me un-subscribes!!
 
"... once filming was completed, we would have liked to have offered the Fabia cake to local charities, schools and hospitals. Unfortunately, as the car had been under studio lights for several days, it may have posed a health and safety risk if eaten and we were therefore unable to do this.

It was decided that as we were unable to donate the cake to charity, the cake was instead recycled. It was taken away and composted, so that it could return to the natural environment. The cake was taken to a place called the East London Community Recycling Project in Clapton. The project has been set up to provide local residents and members with quality compost for use on their gardens or allotments."

:(

Who cares about the health risk I'd have still eaten it!!!
 
You can't be serious! So a plane on a treadmill generates air movement (aka wind)?

The wheels are not fixed, they spin with the movement of the treadmill. The plane is then free to move forwards at whatever speed it likes - the engines provide the thrust to move forwards and it then takes off.
And it takes off because...

THERE IS LIFT - what causes lift? THE VERTICAL FORCE COMPONENT ON THE WINGS DUE TO AIRFLOW.
 
The thing you're missing (and the thing I missed at first, the first time round), is that the wheels have no effect on the speed of the plane. They're just spinning freely. So once you get that in your head, you can basically take the treadmill, the wheels, everything out of the equation.

Literally this simple - stuff comes out of the engines

that stuff pushes the plane forward

That the wheels will be spinning twice as fast is irrelevant - because the treadmill can only act on the plane's wheels, and the wheels do not affect the plane's speed

The points in bold is what just refused to sink in with me last time, once it went in I got it.

Best explanation in this thread imo, if you don't understand after reading this then you're hopeless :p
 
Going waaaay back to the OP regarding Mythbusters, I think the bottom line here sums it all up:

mythbusters said:
Adam's Top 10 Reasons We Won't Revisit Plane on a Conveyor Belt

10. There's no way it's affordable to put a bigger plane on an even bigger conveyor belt.

9. The engineering involved in putting a larger (heavier) plane on a bigger (more durable) conveyor belt and pulling it faster is prohibitive.

8. It would take too much time to put a bigger plane on a conveyor belt. We just don't allot that kind of time to a revisit.

7. A revisit is usually triggered when we get information that is NEW, AND has a (snowball's) chance (in you-know-where) of changing our minds. Neither of those two criteria have happened in this case.

6. If you think we need to show why a plane that's not moving won't take off, you're missing the point.

5. If you think we need to take into account the wind created by the conveyor belt itself, you're missing the point.

4. Jamie thinks it would be a waste of time.

3. I think it would be a waste of time.

2. If you really think about it, we got it right.

1. Come ON! We put a gall-durned actual, honest-to-goodness plane on a bona fide conveyor belt and it TOOK OFF. What MORE do you people WANT?! If you're not satisfied by that, I doubt that anything we could do would help.
 
And it takes off because...

THERE IS LIFT - what causes lift? THE VERTICAL FORCE COMPONENT ON THE WINGS DUE TO AIRFLOW.

Tell me why there's no airflow.

By your argument, if you rested a toy car (with free-spinning wheels) on a similar conveyor belt and pushed with all your might, it would stay perfectly still while the conveyor belt would spin wildly.

In fact, the conveyor belt could even be vertical, with the car resting against it, and the car would just stay there rather than falling down.

These are both exactly the same principle as the plane problem; do they sound in any way plausible?
 
Last edited:
You can't be serious! So a plane on a treadmill generates air movement (aka wind)?
I agree the plane does take off. But you can't be serious. So from you're point of view, if there is no air movement over wings what makes it take off. Let's work backwards...

Plane takes off.
This is because there is lift.
Lift is there because there is a vertical force on wings.
This vertical force is due to the airflow over wings.
Airflow is there because the plane is moving against the atmosphere.
The plane is moving because of thrust.
Thrust is there due to engines.
The engines keep the plane on the belt.
 
Tell me why there's no airflow.

By your argument, if you put a toy car (with free-spinning wheels) on a similar conveyor belt and pushed with all your might, it would stay still. Does that sound plausible?
Read my post again. Where did I say there is no airflow. There is. Zefan thinks there isn't.
 
I agree the plane does take off. But you can't be serious. So from you're point of view, if there is no air movement over wings what makes it take off. Let's work backwards...

Plane takes off.
This is because there is lift.
Lift is there because there is a vertical force on wings.
This vertical force is due to the airflow over wings.
Airflow is there because the plane is moving against the atmosphere.
The plane is moving because of thrust.
Thrust is there due to engines.
The engines keep the plane on the belt.

There isn't airflow, it's the plane moving through the air that creates the lift... I haven't ever said that there's no lift.

The plane moves forwards, that is where the lift comes from.

You're claiming that there's somehow lift produced when the plane is still, that my friend is completely crazy.
 
I got through half a page and my head imploded.. but,

Is the conveyor belt acting on the wheels to make the plane appear to be stationary after the thrust is engaged?

Basically, has the pilot pushed the 'yoke thing' foward, making the bigg ass engines do their thing, yet the reverse direction of the moving floor beneath is causing the plane to appear stationary?

If this is what the experiment is trying to achieve, couldnt the 'hand brake' just be left on to give the same effect? And surely this would mean no lift off?..

Probably not, but I like butter
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom