Absolute scum

Aeleys · 18 Oct 2013 at 19:00

DanielMMS said:
I just can't understand who could do that kind of thing. I simply don't get it at all

It's easy to understand, justice system doesn't work and we put up with things we shouldn't have to.

So people see things like this as "fun" which they can get away with easily, so they do it just to do it and show off in front of all their boyfriends.

As you said just scum.

Leprechaun312 · 18 Oct 2013 at 19:33

Aeleys said:
It's easy to understand, justice system doesn't work and we put up with things we shouldn't have to.

So people see things like this as "fun" which they can get away with easily, so they do it just to do it and show off in front of all their boyfriends.

As you said just scum.

too true

Teknobry · 18 Oct 2013 at 19:59

Horrible thing to happen, i hope that somehow the person who did it is caught.

I see though the typical daily mail reader is straight in with the 'ban it!!' Comments. :rolleyes:

Addicted · 18 Oct 2013 at 20:00

Spunkey said:
Wow

Thread title pretty much nailed it.

You got it, that is low.

Westyfield2 · 18 Oct 2013 at 20:24

Scum should be put down.

[TW]Sponge · 18 Oct 2013 at 21:43

233 said:
Quick q is your friend out of pocket for vet bills etc?

Happy to chuck something into a ocuk whip round if needed

Good idea. Would be happy to chuck a few quid in if needed.

Yas786 · 18 Oct 2013 at 21:58

Wow just wow at the ability of some people to do such a horrific thing to a dog.

Utter utter scumbags, hope they get caught.

mattyfez · 18 Oct 2013 at 22:01

There seems to be a lack of context in the OP.

Has GD really fallen to daily mail standards?

I see two scenarios here,

1)a blind man's dog was shot at in broad daylight outside the local sainsburys for no apparent reason.

2) some ***** had a ***** dog wrapped up in a high visibility jacket.

Anyone care to elaborate?

areksnumbr1sxylady · 18 Oct 2013 at 22:20

mattyfez said:
There seems to be a lack of context in the OP.

Has GD really fallen to daily mail standards?

I see two scenarios here,

1)a blind man's dog was shot at in broad daylight outside the local sainsburys for no apparent reason.

2) some ***** had a ***** dog wrapped up in a high visibility jacket.

Anyone care to elaborate?

yeah and he was muslamic on top of that.

JRS · 18 Oct 2013 at 23:11

mattyfez said:
There seems to be a lack of context in the OP.

Has GD really fallen to daily mail standards?

I see two scenarios here,

1)a blind man's dog was shot at in broad daylight outside the local sainsburys for no apparent reason.

2) some ***** had a ***** dog wrapped up in a high visibility jacket.

Anyone care to elaborate?

*sigh*

God bless GD....'cause no other bugger would bless it....

Uther · 19 Oct 2013 at 00:11

Some horrible people about.

Flibster · 19 Oct 2013 at 01:02

The gene pool really needs a good dose of chlorine.

Transam · 19 Oct 2013 at 01:04

If it's a .22 rifle, the police can determine what kind of gun it was fired from, once they get the bullet out. If it's an air rifle - who knows, maybe the locals have seen him out shooting? Any suspects can legally have their rifle confiscated and tested - any rifle leaves a "fingerprint" on the pellet/bullet.

Boycey0211 · 19 Oct 2013 at 01:38

Transam said:
If it's a .22 rifle, the police can determine what kind of gun it was fired from, once they get the bullet out. If it's an air rifle - who knows, maybe the locals have seen him out shooting? Any suspects can legally have their rifle confiscated and tested - any rifle leaves a "fingerprint" on the pellet/bullet.

If its any kind of air rifle they'll have to get the weapon to do a bore comparison, so hopefully someone has information