Thing is, you said 'killed or injured'. Which is it? Why put killed in if you later say ' I'm not aware of any being killed'. Bit odd that.
You made a mistake. Just man up.
Abu Qatada
- Thread starter the wopster
- Start date
Thing is, you said 'killed or injured'. Which is it? Why put killed in if you later say ' I'm not aware of any being killed'. Bit odd that.
You made a mistake. Just man up.
I didn't say killed or injured. The question was killed or injured. The answer is still hundreds if not thousands.
The mistake wasn't mine.
Go cry me a river then, the name suits you as you constantly incessantly talk ****. Perhaps you need to go see someone and get a lobotomy done but i fear that wont help your cause much.
As for Gilly banning me??, he could if he wanted to but obviously im not in the minority here thinking what im thinking with regards to u.
Also i am not sticking up for him, hes a big lad now and can stick up for himself. I was just wondering why you feel the need to constantly tell everyone that he is a member of the UAF when evidently you have absolutely no proof.
Pathetic
It makes a mockery of our human rights laws which were so certain that he couldn't possibly get a fair trial in Jordan. Hopefully this will pave the way for speedier deportations for Islamic Extremists.
If we have any sense, no. Under our human rights laws, very probably.
Also, that article states that he was deported - he wasn't was he? He left of his own free will.
Pigs will fly before they let him into the country.
Well we let convicted murderers into this country (which apparently is fine according to some ultra-liberal idiots on this forum) so on what grounds can we stop someone who isn't guilty? I fear that Abu Qatada's human rights will trump common sense and national security.
He's subject to a lifetime deportation order and also doesn't have a UK passport.
Of course we carry on funding his large family living off our state.
Ruling does seem to be a bit of a joke.
And i really can't see any UK government allowing him back into the country. Regardless of what he claims his human rights are. IIRC his family went with him to Jordan, so he can't claim separation from his family. He doesn't contribute to the UK economically so what value does the UK gain by allowing entry.
And i really can't see any UK government allowing him back into the country. Regardless of what he claims his human rights are. IIRC his family went with him to Jordan, so he can't claim separation from his family. He doesn't contribute to the UK economically so what value does the UK gain by allowing entry.
They might have gone but several of them have UK passports so you know what that means.
So I can conceive of a scenario where his family challenge the lifetime deportation order and any attempt to block his return to the UK as a breach of the European Convention on Human Rights which states they have a right to family life. Of course, all legal costs would be covered by the state under legal aid (which is being denied to everyone else).