Yes its full RES for passive (what would be point if 1/2?), your brain adds both together same as everything you see.
Example : before my new contact lenses prescription I was not seeing 20/20 out either eye on their own but both at same time I was.
Optician told me your eye uses the info from both eyes to add together.
New prescription both are 20/20 on their own.
A scientist once wore a special pair of specs that made everything upside down, after a period of time (not sure if it was 1 or 2 weeks) his brain compensated for it and the image was right way up.
3D is a gimmick IMO and seems the BBC who dropped it for now, but try it on a LG LCD and see it at its best, better than Active (or simply read the reviews).
On a monitor for gaming I would prefer Active though.
You say "most" there is the catch and you clutching at straws.
I used a LG passive same as most Theatres.
QUOTE: "LG claims they show all the resolution in the 1080p signal to each eye temporally"
http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/active-3d-vs-passive-3d-whats-better/
No matter what others said there in comments, an Optician know better how eyes work.
If you have 2 windows with slated (venetian) blinds on them and on left window slats #2/4/6/8/10 are missing and on the right window slats #1/3/5/7/9 are missing and you take a photo of both and put on top of each other you see slats #1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10.
You may want to do some homework before posting BS blanket statements, Touché![]()
Go and see a LG LCD then, the above link states 1080p not 4k so stop moving the goalposts.
The guys TV is cracked/end of thread.
Go and see a LG LCD then, the above link states 1080p not 4k so stop moving the goalposts.
The guys TV is cracked/end of thread.