Advanced Technology

Glaucus said:
The profits change, the profits no longer are from the fuel, they change to the fuel cell and the engineering and materials contained within the fuel cell.

Wtf has hydrogen fuel cells got to do with your stupid claims?
Hydrogen is not water.
Click to expand...

The profits decrease.

The water powered car uses electrolysis to split the oxygen and hydrogen and uses the hydrogen to fuel the car. Something like that, so I just said hydrogen.

And they are not my stupid claims, I am just giving forth evidence whereas you have non to disprove the technology except your blind 'stupid' faith.
 
Try any of these...

Rendlesham Forest Incident, December 1980 – UFO landing.

The Belgian Wave, March 1990 – UFO tracked on radar; F-16 fighters launched in attempted intercept.

The Cosford Incident, March 1993 – Direct overflight of two RAF bases by large triangular UFO.

RAF Lakenheath/RAF Bentwaters, August 1956 – Radar/visual case.

Manchester Airport, 1995 – Near-miss between UFO and civil aircraft.

Captain Zaghetti’s Sighting, 1991 – Near-miss between UFO and civil aircraft.

Pitlochry Photograph, 1990 – Diamond-shaped UFO in daylight; MoD technical analysis finds no evidence of fakery.

Iranian Intercept, 1976. F-4 Phantom jets chase UFOs.

North Sea Overtake, 1990 – RAF Tornados overtaken by UFO; other sightings and radar detections in Europe.

Captain Graham Sheppard, 1967 – Two radar/visual sightings
 
salami1212 said:
The profits decrease.

The water powered car uses electrolysis to split the oxygen and hydrogen and uses the hydrogen to fuel the car. Something like that, so I just said hydrogen.

And they are not my stupid claims, I am just giving forth evidence whereas you have non to disprove the technology except your blind 'stupid' faith.
Click to expand...

The water powered car was a hoax to make money, he even lost a court case.
That is basic physics.
You have to put in the energy to break the bonds, you can't eat more energy out than in.
Yes they are your stupid claims. A water fuel cell is drastically different to a hydrogen fuel cell. A hydrogen fuel cell is taking hydrogen and oxygen and creating water and this releasing energy,
A water fuel cell you have to break the water into hydrogen and oxygen then recombine them, you won't get more energy out than you put in.

These realy are retarded claims, supported by nothing, but what you've read on CT sites.
 
Last edited:
salami1212 said:
The profits decrease.

The water powered car uses electrolysis to split the oxygen and hydrogen and uses the hydrogen to fuel the car. Something like that, so I just said hydrogen.

And they are not my stupid claims, I am just giving forth evidence whereas you have non to disprove the technology except your blind 'stupid' faith.
Click to expand...

It's a load of rubbish as it takes far more energy to split the hydrogen & oxygen than you get out in return as usable hydrogen. You'd be better off using the energy to power an electric car, ergo it's not a practical method of generating fuel.
 
Blue160 said:
What am I watching there?:confused:

I want to read about how it's done rather than watching a bloke with a load of barrels, hoses, and wires in his back garden.
Click to expand...

It's a well knowen scam, it's one of those kits you can buy on ebay, it's just electrolysis and takes more power than it gives out.

http://www.aardvark.co.nz/hho.shtml

But the op, after doing no reserch belives it and it couldn't possibly be a scam.
 
salami1212 said:
When the atom was first discovered, do you think they believed you could split it and create enormous energy from it?

Thought you were out last post? :p
Click to expand...

The atom being discovered has little relevance to this though. The models presented with regards to the atom all detailed that there were multiple components to it; thus splitting it would have been a possible research area that would naturally evolve from that, which it did a a rapid pace.

Electrons aren't a particle that you could split further, as they aren't in the strictest sense particles such as protons, neutrons, neutrinos, quarks etc are - they are a point particle with no fixed size. I'm not going to delve into into quantam mechanics as it's simply getting away from the original point.

The whole idea is pish.

As for the "water engine", it was a hoax with numerous court cases as a result. So you can cross that off your list.

"Water fuel cell" would be pointless as Glaucus has already explained, you do not gain any energy, it simply stores it.

A hydrogen fuel cell isn't a viable solution to many energy issues in this current time with the current technology we have. Maybe one day it will be, but that won't be for a very long time as our entire civilization relies on the presence of fossil fuels. Wanting to change that is like trying to preach to a Priest that the Bible is wrong.

The majority of "UFO" sightings are simply people being dim or not understanding physics and the effects it can have to cause natural phenomenae, such as optical illusions.

As for "government reports" that detail UFOs, in none of these would they make reference to an "alien craft" in the sense you are using it as. A UFO is an unidentified object - something that, at the time of reporting, is not known to that organisation. Go look at any working prototype of any military aircraft - there will be UFO sightings that look suspiciously like these.

As for the entire idea of alien life knowing about our existence, let alone contacting us, is so improbable and unlikely you may as well call it non-existent - we simply do not have a large enough "footprint" in our galaxy to have made any meaningful communication with the universe around us.

For the record, I have very little to do right now... :(
 
Last edited:
Glaucus said:
The water powered car was a hoax to make money, he even lost a court case.
That is basic physics.
You have to put in the energy to break the bonds, you can't eat more energy out than in.
Yes they are your stupid claims. A water fuel cell is drastically different to a hydrogen fuel cell. A hydrogen fuel cell is taking hydrogen and oxygen and creating water and this releasing energy,
A water fuel cell you have to break the water into hydrogen and oxygen then recombine them, you won't get more energy out than you put in.

These relay are retarded claims, supported by nothing, but what you've read on CT sites.
Click to expand...

Ok, so because he lost a court case he is suddenly lieing?

Im not claiming to know much about these technologies. Water powered utilising hydrogen ie hydrogen power ie hydrogen fuel is same same in my eyes. Maybe some mechanics are different but that is all technicalities which you are picking at. I dont think you know anything about these technologies..

And if what im saying is true, why would there be masses of evidence broadcasted everywhere? There wouldnt.

I think its retarded that people live in little bubbles believing everything they watch and read on the news. And I think also, its quite sad when people dont realise that they defend such an unbelievably corrupt system which is only out to get them. Its the equivalent of punching yourself in the face in a fist fight with someone else.
 
salami1212 said:
Ok, so because he lost a court case he is suddenly lieing?

Im not claiming to know much about these technologies. Water powered utilising hydrogen ie hydrogen power ie hydrogen fuel is same same in my eyes. Maybe some mechanics are different but that is all technicalities which you are picking at. I dont think you know anything about these technologies..

And if what im saying is true, why would there be masses of evidence broadcasted everywhere? There wouldnt.

I think its retarded that people live in little bubbles believing everything they watch and read on the news. And I think also, its quite sad when people dont realise that they defend such an unbelievably corrupt system which is only out to get them. Its the equivalent of punching yourself in the face in a fist fight with someone else.
Click to expand...

You clearly know nothing.
He lost in court, it was never indecently tested, it goes against the third law of thermodynamics. It was a big scam then and it's a big scam know. If you even spent two minutes on google reserching, you would know this.

You've just described yourself there, in the last paragpn. So don't try pulling that Bs, there's only you who hasn't looked at all sides and have fallen for BS.

If what you are saying is true? It's not true, the end. You are so far from the truth it's scary.

I don't know anything? Electeolysis has been around for donkeys years, it's a well knowen process, but it still can't break thermodynamics.

They are reserching hydrogen fuel cells for cars, but it's not some magical solution. It's simply being used as a battery, with the energy coming from massive power plants splitting water into hydrogen that is then stored and used a bit like petrol. It's easier to create such fuels large scale in a central location.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom