bazola said:
Yeah i suppose.
6 points is bad but do you know if they issue 6 without having to go to court.
you're really not listening are you...
LESS THAN 30MPH OVER THE SPEED LIMIT IS 3 POINTS AND £60.
so if you were in a 40, doing 60 you are 100% in the clear (so to speak).
IF you were caught you will ONLY get 3 points.. END OF STORY.
My best man at my wedding and the man who I was best man for and my longest mate (all the same person lol) joined thames valley police about a year ago and is just doing his traffic attachment, I have gone over this in great detail with him, I know exactly what i can get away with, what I can't, and what to expect should you get caught.
I was stopped in 96 doing 69.5 in a 40, frankly driving dangerously (hey.. I was 19) and got 3 points.
The rule is 10% + 2mph anyway so they wouldn't have batted an eyelid if you were doing 46mph in the 40 anyway.. there is every likelyhood your speedo is up to 10% out so an indicated 60 is quite possibly only mid 50s anyway. It just isn't worth the courts time, effort and money to take you to court.
I was done by a mobile camera doing 42 in a 30 and got 3 points.
I was done by another mobile camera doing 85 in a 70 and got 3 points.
Both dual carriageways, they were both on my side of the road.
You really have to be giving it some serious beans or be driving like a total tool to be summonsed.