Why are there no gaming benchmarks? is it really that bad?
![Cry laughing :cry: :cry:](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/cry.gif)
There were gaming benchmarks. Intel Alder Lake Destroys AMD In New Gaming Performance Leak | Digital Trends
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Why are there no gaming benchmarks? is it really that bad?
Ah, it would appear so. It seems like Intel will be coming out with all guns blazing.
Strange the 10900k isn’t on the list. Again no gaming benchmarks!
There were gaming benchmarks. Intel Alder Lake Destroys AMD In New Gaming Performance Leak | Digital Trends
No one is buying it for CPU-Z benchmarking, it needs to do a lot more than that, Rocket Lake is also better at CPU-Z benchmarking than Zen 3 but comparatively crap at everything else, and Guess what, Rocket Lake is a sales flop.
Do you ever read beyond click bait headlines? Seriously?
"Destroys AMD in Gaming benchmarks"
Here having the meaning of 3DMark TimeSpy, that's it, the only noteworthy thing under that headline.
Click bait headlines are for idiots @4K8KW10
Did you bother to enter the "clickbait" link?
"Within the same High (1440p) preset, the Intel Core i9-12900K scores up to 146.6 FPS average while the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X system with a 64 GB DDR4 memory and an RTX 3080 scores 104.6 FPS. The reason for using these two benchmarks for comparison is that all benchmark presets including the version match here."
Intel Core i9-12900K Alder Lake Faster Than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X In Ashes of The Singularity Benchmark (wccftech.com)
40% faster performance!
TBH, Intel are probably still working out the microcode.
It very well could be brilliant but nothing so far suggests that. so far all we know its its very good in one very specific way, AVX loads. Which probably explains its 300 Watt power draw.
2xSkylake overclocked i5 quad cores with fluff rearranged, glued to 8 Atom cores and another single generation socket.
Isn't that the truth! All the Intel engineers seemed to aiming for with RocketLake is getting single threaded benchmarks on par with Ryzen, overlooking most other details. We'll see what Alderlake brings to the party once the other details come to light.No one is buying it for CPU-Z benchmarking, it needs to do a lot more than that, Rocket Lake is also better at CPU-Z benchmarking than Zen 3 but comparatively crap at everything else, and Guess what, Rocket Lake is a sales flop.
Not sure that is the case on a mobile devices. The various sensors, compute tasks, face unlock, finger print scanners e.c.t are offloaded to the GPU. A lot of time is spent on youtube and video watching which again is offloaded to the GPU even in 2D as its more power efficient. Its not that the CPU cannot do the tasks its that the tasks are more power efficient on the GPU.The M1 Max's CPU cluster is only about a quarter of the size of the GPU cluster.
While Apple's core are very impressive even the M1 Max only has 8+2 of them.
Have to say that their decision to dedicate so much of the die GPUs is a strange one. Only certain professional workloads will benefit from the GPU, while far more things would benefit from 16+2 cores.
Wasn't the Zen 3 review embargo the same day as release?Yeah, come back once the embargo has been lifted and actual reviews come out. All this right now is just risking being wrong on so many levels at the moment. I've heard all this before how even 11th Gen was going to be the Ryzen killer and look how that turned out once actual reviews were allowed to be put out.
If they were really winning in everything here, this embargo would've been lifted weeks ago.