Me personally Far right and left peeps no matter how ridiculous they are should remain, only when it breaks a law a video/post etc should be considered to be removed
Inciting violence is against teh alw, which is why youtube has banned Alex Jones
Me personally Far right and left peeps no matter how ridiculous they are should remain, only when it breaks a law a video/post etc should be considered to be removed
Do the videos consistently break youtubes T&Cs?
Inciting violence is against teh alw, which is why youtube has banned Alex Jones
If that's the case then rightly so but Will the peeps calling for are did violently attack people like The quartering and alike should and have they been banned from social media as well?
I'm no fan of Alex Jones, but to wipe his account from the 'net is not the right thing to do. If you don't like what he's saying DON'T WATCH IT!
No idea, I don't report video's unless it something illegal. Even if its illegal we know can be hard to get a image or a video pulled down from facebook or youtube
So how do you know they should be removed?
That it was a false flag op, then that no one actually died/it was all made up with actors etc.
I think the post you quoted already makes clear my POV, I presume you missed read "I don't report" for "I don't watch"?
Ok so looking into it, he checked the crime records for Newtown in 2012 and no murders were reported, but the murders had actually been reported on a different register because it was investigated by the state Police rather than local Police. So his claims were false, but he did have a reason as to why he said it.
If you don'r report them then how do you know they wont be removed?
It has nothing to do with not liking him.
I know, it's to do with censorship.
YT have a virtual monopoly in the sector and have overstepped in banning him. People may be mass flagging his accounts but it's not always for valid reasons, this mob mentality has got to stop - but it won't now because they will become emboldened due to getting a big win with this ban.
As I say, I don't like him, it's all about free speech for me. He's not inciting terrorism, but he is a popular figure and I do agree that the timing, of all the bans, are suspiciously close to the US midterm elections - so I could see a way that this is politically motivated.
I know, it's to do with censorship.
YT have a virtual monopoly in the sector and have overstepped in banning him. People may be mass flagging his accounts but it's not always for valid reasons, this mob mentality has got to stop - but it won't now because they will become emboldened due to getting a big win with this ban.
As I say, I don't like him, it's all about free speech for me. He's not inciting terrorism, but he is a popular figure and I do agree that the timing, of all the bans, are suspiciously close to the US midterm elections - so I could see a way that this is politically motivated.
PRIVATE COMPANY.
You can still disagree with it can't you?
Of course, feel free to stop using youtube, that's all you can do as a free citizen against a private corporate enterprise with it's product. It's strangely left wing to think that a private company needs to bow to whims of misguided attempts to believe their freedoms mean anything inside a dictatorship. It's the only way the internet even functions.