Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 30,499
- Location
- Dormanstown.
The whole thing was tongue in cheek and I thought you knew me better than that![]()
/Fail.
Internet needs verbal communication component with faces.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The whole thing was tongue in cheek and I thought you knew me better than that![]()
Kaveri would be capable if bandwidth wasn't an issue, but it is, and unless something's drastically changed, it'll affect Carrizzo too.
Same hype, different product.
And are we sure it *just* needs to be DP output? Sounds like guessing to me.
Where does a 265 sit in the spectrum of cards from years gone by? As I'm none too clued up on the lower end of the scale, be roughly 6950 levels of performance?
If your point was valid, then the same thing can be said about developers splitting resources to support GameWorks, with features that would only benefit Nvidia users, rather than putting in more effort making the most of the dx features that would benefit both AMD or Nvidia user.Freesycn/Gsycn have no effect on game developers that have to do next to nothing.
Where something like mantel will split developer resourse as they have two sets of API's to support.
It's a rebranded HD7850, so if they can feed it and achieve close to that in an APU, it would be pretty good going.
Looks to be around 6970 level.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1061?vs=1076
Lots of people seem to want Adapative Sync to fail. Their posts have zero logic, just "opinion" why it will, or has already failed.
Lots of people seem to want Adapative Sync to fail. Their posts have zero logic, just "opinion" why it will, or has already failed.
Lots of people seem to want Adapative Sync to fail. Their posts have zero logic, just "opinion" why it will, or has already failed.
Can I ask why you have such disdain for a faceless company?Personally I don't want adaptive sync to fail, I want freesync to fail. Infact, I'd like that company to burn to the ground.
I will be 100% truthful.
Lots of people seem to want Adapative Sync to fail. Their posts have zero logic, just "opinion" why it will, or has already failed.
Can you show me these "lots of people". I have only seen people want it to do well. I am a G-Sync user and can't wait for the AMD users to experience what I personally enjoy.
Can I ask why you have such disdain for a faceless company?![]()
As an NVIDIA user, I'm more focused on gsync as that's what ill need. Freesync, I have little knowledge of tbh. But id never want to see the company fail, at the end of the day theres peoples livelihoods at stake. And the ordinary Joe working on the factory floor in the countries were the components are made, probably isn't on that great a wage to start with.One of the reasons is they ruined a perfectly good company which I liked in ATI and put their own cringeworthy AMD stamp on things. That's one of a long list.
i dont want to experience what u personally enjoy gregster!!
euuuwww