the CPU itself is fine, the problem is that its not worth a penny over $50
Yep exactly, the performance for the price when compared to cheaper intel chips is just insulting.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
the CPU itself is fine, the problem is that its not worth a penny over $50
and a year too late. Its a recycled scrap part.
The laughing isn't because we're all packing vastly more powerful systems, it's because it is overpriced. If you are building a new budget system you are better served with a 12100F on B660 both costing under £100 (yes personally I would get a better CPU anyway but then you leave yourself open to not making a fair comparison). If you are upgrading on AM4 then I would just get a second hand 3700X / 5600 or similar.
He does but by "we" and "us" I assumed you meant people on this forum.
Its not a bad CPU, Steve Burke is totally off with that, he is a bit of a snob and looks down on anything that isn't high end, there is nothing wrong with its performance, it just isn't high end.
It is over priced. But that's it.
You must be thinking of some other Steve Burke, because the Steve Burke I know of rated the 12100 & 12100f very highly which, obviously, a snob who looks down on anything that isn't high end wouldn't ever do.
Just to let you all know, I snagged a 3600x for £126 the other day off Fleebay...
Sure it was bids and I was lucky there were no serious buyers as this chip sells for like £220 new.
What does this new waste of sand offer that a 2600 used don't offer? or for someone like me who grabs a deal on by what seems like a superior CPU?
There are many different kinds of snob, you can't compare the 12100 and the 4500 and conclude one is bad while the other is good, the 4500 is energy efficient, its not much if any different in games vs the 12100 and its better at MT productivity.
a snob who looks down on anything budget wouldn't rate the 12100/12100f at all, let alone very highly. Do you understand what that says about your statement or not?
Right, let's just cut to the chase.
You lied. You made of that BS statement about Steve Burke because you dont agree with him. And when pulled up on it you try to suggest the only difference is who made the processors, as if Steve didnt rip the 11900k to shreds....when we all know he did.
At least admit you pulled that statement out of your arse.
You can interoperate what you like, i don't care to convince you of anything, you asked and i gave you an answer, your not liking that answer doesn't change the fact that i think he's a snob, its also not the first time i've said that about him, i said the same thing when he used the same clown act to sniff at the first generation threadripper using the tired old "AMD MOAR COARS" critique.
Interoperate?
I didnt ask you a question, I made an observation. And if it was a question, your reply wouldn't have answered it anyway. "There are many kinds of snobs" does not in any way address what i said, so it's really not about whether i like your answer or not, it's about your completely inability to justify the bull you're writing about Steve Burke. You saying it previously doesn't make any difference, either - You were just as wrong then as you are now.
GN spend a lot of time reviewing budget gear along with everything else. They wouldn't even bother if they weren't interested. This is demonstrable fact.
Ok, i'll be blunt, i think he's a brand snob.