• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD RDNA™ 4 and RX 9000 Series Reveal - Live Chat [1pm UK time]

ISTM that these cards are massively overpriced and AMD are making the mistake about which Gamers Nexus warned. These cards should be £hundreds cheaper. These cards are apparently only mildly faster than a RTX 3080 - or about the level of a putative RTX 5060.

Put the RX 7600 at £199, the 9070 at £299, and the XT at £399.

£650 is the new £400
 
And so what? AMD needs to get people to buy these cards and build market share. They need to be significantly cheaper than Nvidia’s cards.

They don't need to do anything.

Why do pc hardware enthusiasts feel so entitled lol.
 
DLSS 4 is worth the extra £150 over this if everything sold at MSRP
Won't know until next week if these cards are actually worth it or not...
 
I see you go for the big bucks 3090 and 4090 ? I'm a peasant so want most value for money and it's certainly looking like AMD is providing me that

3080 - 4090 - 5090, each time buying at MSRP (3080 was +£25) and selling for nearly the same, so upgrading is not as costly as it looks
£300 to upgrade from 4090 to 5090, so I gamed on it for over a year and a half, then sold it for more than it cost.

Once you splash out once, subsequent upgrades cost less than buying mid-range or even upper range cards so in the long run you get better value for money.
High end hold their value a lot better and you get to game with higher settings & refresh rates. Yes, the initial purchase stings, but after that the total cost of ownership is very similar, if not better.
 
3080 - 4090 - 5090, each time buying at MSRP (3080 was +£25) and selling for nearly the same, so upgrading is not as costly as it looks
£300 to upgrade from 4090 to 5090, so I gamed on it for over a year and a half, then sold it for more than it cost.

Once you splash out once, subsequent upgrades cost less than buying mid-range or even upper range cards so in the long run you get better value for money.
High end hold their value a lot better and you get to game with higher settings & refresh rates. Yes, the initial purchase stings, but after that the total cost of ownership is very similar, if not better.
That's not always true though, look at the 2080ti for instance. If the 6000 series is far better then I think the 5090 could be worth c£1000 and that's quite a large loss (£1500 in some cases) for 2 years of use.

Yes there's always a best time to sell and it seems for past few generations it has been near launch day.
 
3080 - 4090 - 5090, each time buying at MSRP (3080 was +£25) and selling for nearly the same, so upgrading is not as costly as it looks
£300 to upgrade from 4090 to 5090, so I gamed on it for over a year and a half, then sold it for more than it cost.

Once you splash out once, subsequent upgrades cost less than buying mid-range or even upper range cards so in the long run you get better value for money.
High end hold their value a lot better and you get to game with higher settings & refresh rates. Yes, the initial purchase stings, but after that the total cost of ownership is very similar, if not better.
You done well good luck sustaining that , like I said I have set budget much much lower and I play at 1440p single player I don't need super high FPS , and online games are much less demanding , so what's available at my budget looks like AMD are offering the best deal
 
That's not always true though, look at the 2080ti for instance. If the 6000 series is far better then I think the 5090 could be worth c£1000 and that's quite a large loss (£1500 in some cases) for 2 years of use.

Yes there's always a best time to sell and it seems for past few generations it has been near launch day.

Even if the 6000 series is better in performance and efficiency Nvidia will charge a massive premium for that. I've done the same as Dave built up each gen at a relatively small upgrade cost.
 
Last edited:
3080 - 4090 - 5090, each time buying at MSRP (3080 was +£25) and selling for nearly the same, so upgrading is not as costly as it looks
£300 to upgrade from 4090 to 5090, so I gamed on it for over a year and a half, then sold it for more than it cost.

Once you splash out once, subsequent upgrades cost less than buying mid-range or even upper range cards so in the long run you get better value for money.
High end hold their value a lot better and you get to game with higher settings & refresh rates. Yes, the initial purchase stings, but after that the total cost of ownership is very similar, if not better.
Are you still peddling your value for money message. :rolleyes: Have you got that saved on notepad and do a copy and paste each time ? ^ You forgot to include what it cost you from 3080 > 4090.
 
Last edited:
3080 - 4090 - 5090, each time buying at MSRP (3080 was +£25) and selling for nearly the same, so upgrading is not as costly as it looks
£300 to upgrade from 4090 to 5090, so I gamed on it for over a year and a half, then sold it for more than it cost.

Once you splash out once, subsequent upgrades cost less than buying mid-range or even upper range cards so in the long run you get better value for money.
High end hold their value a lot better and you get to game with higher settings & refresh rates. Yes, the initial purchase stings, but after that the total cost of ownership is very similar, if not better.
the more you buy the more you save :D
 
Back
Top Bottom