• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD RX 480 Fails PCI-E Specification

:confused:
Why should I make a legal claim, got nothing to do with me. I wouldn't go anywhere near an RX480

But you're clear that you reckon its recall worthy. A huge cost that no one volunteers for unless forced by evidence and law.

AMD must have sent out hundreds of thousands of cards, if they are not demonstrably causing a problem then all AMD has to do is what it has done.

*internet drama over power tolerances*

AMD sends out driver to move a couple of watts.

Now people have to bail on the slot power bandwagon because it's stone dead.

Now the power is on the 6pin/8pin which again is hiding in the power tolerances but now it's harder to complain about.

Unless someone proves a fault and makes a claim which wins AMD has no reason to recall anything.

But if people cannot prove a fault then really what are they demanding.
 
It's not 3%, it's "up to 3%" in one game they focused on as a marketing trick to be able to say 3%. Everything else probably less judging by the clock drops.
 
It's not 3%, it's "up to 3%" in one game they focused on as a marketing trick to be able to say 3%. Everything else probably less judging by the clock drops.

PcPer had this to say about it. More tests still to come I hope.

You’d be hard pressed to find any noticeable difference in performance in our Metro: Last Light performance results at 4K. The average frame rate is actually highest with the new 16.7.1 driver WITHOUT compatibility mode enabled, giving credence to the notion that the driver offers some very slight performance tweaks as AMD stated. With the compatibility mode enabled, performance matches nearly perfectly with the performance we saw with the 16.6.2 launch day driver. There isn’t any frame time variance change to speak of either. Considering the extreme power delta we witness from the base 16.6.2 driver to the 16.7.1 with compatibility mode on, measuring no performance delta is a fantastic result for AMD.

Guru3D not noticing a performance drop either.

http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/radeon-rx-480-performance-benchmarks-with-16-7-1-driver.html
 
Pretty good going by AMD if they have managed to comprehensively fix it with no or negligible performance impact in a matter of days. Though shouldn't really have been that way in the first place.
 
Pretty good going by AMD if they have managed to comprehensively fix it with no or negligible performance impact in a matter of days. Though shouldn't really have been that way in the first place.

+1 they don't need this kind of publicity at launch. They need to be faultless and keep scoring own goals now and then.
 
but just think..if people and reviewers on youtube hadn't spoken out about the pcie current draw we probably wouldn't have these improved drivers..its those people that need a thankyou..not amd,they put themselves in that situation.
 
Pretty good going by AMD if they have managed to comprehensively fix it with no or negligible performance impact in a matter of days. Though shouldn't really have been that way in the first place.

it still shouldn't use that much power the card eats 165watt, i think they have a problem somewhere, the graph shows the chip using 110 watt, that leaves 55watt for memory module which is a lot, itshould be under 30watt, they still have 25-30watt lost somewhere.
does anyone have a 1070 review with broken down results for chip and memory power usage ?
 
Last edited:
The 6 pin is wired like an 8 pin, all the power the card needs is there no issues at all. 480 is doing big sales, all sold out on newegg, AMD market share up 10%.

It is pulling 93W through a setup that has a specified maximum of 75W. That is an issue. How the connector on the card is wired is irrelevant to that because it's only one part of the chain which is out of spec.

You can ignore specs if you like. You can bet your kit on all the manufacturers of all the components in the chain (PSU, cabling, connectors, wiring on boards) making their components rated for well over spec. You'll probably win that bet because they probably will do that.

But to claim that a component drawing 25% more power through a chain of components than any of those components is required to cope with and a major company ignoring specs in order to lie for marketing purposes are not issues at all is simply wrong.
 
Apart from the 6pn connector being out of spec.

A 6-pin pci-e connector can handle much more than the 75W pcie spec.

Each of the 12V 18awg yellow and black wires in the pcie connector can handle over 4.15A. This means that with 3 x12V Yellow wires you can draw 150W (12.5A) of power over a 6-pin connector. The connector itself can handle over 18A of current.

A quick calculation for you:

Power = VxI

So for each wire we get :- 12V x 4.15A = 49.8W
For a pcie 6pin : 3x 49.8W = 149.8W


There is plenty of headroom on the 6-pin connector as it stands. AMD has over engineered the connector circuit anyway by actually using the sense pin as a ground so it can handle more than 150W. The 480 only uses 90W max on the pcie 6-pin but will obviously use more when overclocked like any other gpu on earth ;)
 
Last edited:
A 6-pin pci-e connector can handle much more than the 75W pcie spec.

Each of the 12V 18awg yellow and black wires in the pcie connector can handle over 4.15A. This means that with 3 x12V Yellow wires you can draw 150W (12.5A) of power over a 6-pin connector. The connector itself can handle over 18A of current.

A quick calculation for you:

Power = VxI

So for each wire we get :- 12V x 4.15A = 49.8W
For a pcie 6pin : 3x 49.8W = 149.8W


There is plenty of headroom on the 6-pin connector as it stands. AMD has over engineered the connector circuit anyway by actually using the sense pin as a ground so it can handle more than 150W anyway. The 480 only uses 90W max on the pcie 6-pin but will obviously use more when overclocked like any other gpu on earth ;)

Yes, but it is still technically out of "spec". I am not saying that I agree that it matters ( i don't really) but it is still technically outside PCIe specifcations.
 
A 6-pin pci-e connector can handle much more than the 75W pcie spec.

Each of the 12V 18awg yellow and black wires in the pcie connector can handle over 4.15A. This means that with 3 x12V Yellow wires you can draw 150W (12.5A) of power over a 6-pin connector. The connector itself can handle over 18A of current.

A quick calculation for you:

Power = VxI

So for each wire we get :- 12V x 4.15A = 49.8W
For a pcie 6pin : 3x 49.8W = 149.8W


There is plenty of headroom on the 6-pin connector as it stands. AMD has over engineered the connector circuit anyway by actually using the sense pin as a ground so it can handle more than 150W anyway. The 480 only uses 90W max on the pcie 6-pin but will obviously use more when overclocked like any other gpu on earth ;)

IIRC as far as the wiring goes you could theoretically pull something like 72 watt down each one without any considerations and a fair bit more with temperature and resistance, etc. properly accommodated for.

The PSU itself could be another matter but if ~100watt total over the 6 pin is a problem for you the GPU is one of the least of your worries.
 
Yes, but it is still technically out of "spec". I am not saying that I agree that it matters ( i don't really) but it is still technically outside PCIe specifcations.


When you are overclocking you are always going over the spec anyway. People never had an issue before even when extreme overclocking and overvolting ;)

Some good info here:

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/power-supply-specifications-atx-reference,review-32338-12.html%22]http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/power-supply-specifications-atx-reference,review-32338-12.html

Molex datasheet for standard MINI FIT JR pcie connectors:
http://www.molex.com/pdm_docs/ps/PS-5556-001.pdf

The contacts on the pcie connector can handle over 8A per pin so the quality of the wires and the psu 12V is the only limiting factor. You can probably draw much more than 150W safely.
The pcie spec is lower but the actual physical wires and connectors can handle a lot more and that is all that matters.
 
Last edited:
When you are overclocking you are always going over the spec anyway. People never had a issue before ;)

Some good info here:

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/power-supply-specifications-atx-reference,review-32338-12.html%22]http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/power-supply-specifications-atx-reference,review-32338-12.html

Molex datasheet for standard MINI FIT JR pcie connectors:
http://www.molex.com/pdm_docs/ps/PS-5556-001.pdf

The contacts on the pcie connector can handle over 8A per pin so the quality of the wires and the psu 12V is the only limiting factor. You can probably draw much more than 150W safely.
The pcie spec is lower but the actual physical wires and connectors can handle a lot more and that is all that matters. When you are overclocking you are always going over the spec anyway.

I know! Im not saying it does matter (in the post you quoted as well!) but it technically does go over the standardised specs.

Even the 6 pin can probably carry 150w on it's own like an 8 pin but i believe the two extra ground wires on the 8 pin are to help with the current at the higher wattage.
 
Back
Top Bottom