Genuine question is why?
Ok he's got his preferred game plan which he believed was the way to
a) compete with the top sides in the league and Europe
b) play an exciting attacking and possession dominant style that would be true to the traditions of the club
I always felt the system talk was overdone and actually what he was doing was trying to assert himself over some lazy players by using the 3-4-3 framework to hold them to some structure and instill the work rate required to be a top side. This team did not press consistently under ten Hag. They had very little shape, were routinely played through and humbled by teams like Brighton, Bournemouth, Palace. We were a "moments" team. I feel he broke that pattern of behaviour and was starting to get players working as hard off the ball as on it. Yesterday was a good example - last season we would have lost that game. Leeds would have outfought us, out run us and likely would have won. I don't underestimate how hard it is to get a group of players to graft out a result when they have been used to losing or occasionally rescued by Bruno Fernandes.
If Amorim had compromised before getting the effort levels competitive then he knew he would have lost authority and that's critical at a club like United.
Regardless, Ineos have effectively now wasted 14 months and need to hope that they get some sort of bounce in the short term and not a run of 4 defeats - Burnley, Brighton, City, Arsenal.
I do understand what you are saying, but the harsh reality is that Amorim made a mess of things himself too. After more than a year in charge he will go down as one of the worst managers in English top flight football history, purely in terms of points and achievements. His repeated confused messaging to both fans and players played out on the pitch, and he seemed bizarrely dogmatic and determined to go down with the ship (his unorthodox and unproven system).
Not only that, he openly fell out with numerous players, and yes OK they may be bad eggs, or maybe he just mismanaged some of them - we can't really know.
I've felt that throughout his time here, he's got most calls wrong and has been consistently sinking without trace. All the other things can be true too, the board are hopeless, the players aren't good enough - but none of that absolves the manager of his responsibility too.
I don't necessarily believe this myself, but I think you could make an argument that he was a charming snake oil salesman all along and has pulled a fast one on Ratcliffe (who seemed to love him, rather strangely).
He blew it, time and time again.


