They're not wrong though - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald's_Restaurants - make for some shocking reading with McD's effectively losing upto $800k (actual amount is under NDA) rather than pay the $20k the lady was asking for to cover her injury.
Ana de Armas fans told they can sue over Yesterday trailer
- Thread starter Scam
- Start date
They're not wrong though - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald's_Restaurants - make for some shocking reading with McD's effectively losing upto $800k (actual amount is under NDA) rather than pay the $20k the lady was asking for to cover her injury.
I must have seen that trailer too, sat waiting for her to appear but a no show
God knows how they arrived at the 5m claim.Stranger things have happened like the $1m claim a woman got from Mcdonalds for serving her hot coffee
She was completely justified in her claim, whatever amount she actually got. She was initially only asking for enough to cover the medical expenses for the severe injuries she suffered due to McDonalds having a policy of knowingly and deliberately endangering customers. IMO criminal charges against the people responsible for that policy would have been justified. It wasn't about "hot coffee". There are plenty of examples of frivolous litigation, but that isn't one of them.
