another school kid arrested

Spawn said:
The Kooh i noor wasnt stolen was it??, so i guess it was given to you just like that eh?? rofl:p.
What riches did you steal??,....hmmm lets see all the crown jewels that belong to the Queen at one time belonged to someone else, which were then taken forcefully by you and given to the Queen...Tell me what you havent stolen from other lands or people exactly??.



Why should he??, maybe he was born here so has just as much right as you do being here??. Nice to know that if us immigrants have an issue or issues and we air them, we are then told to go back home...

Pretty much everything ever attributed to Islam was stolen or the "spoils od war and conquest". What double standards you operate. When Islam forces its way around the world by the sword you prefer to forget about that and brush it off.

THe poster was told that if he hated the UK so much to leave. Problem with that?

So who exactly does the Koh I Noor "belong" to ?http://www.answers.com/topic/koh-i-noor

It seems every owner it has had has taken it in war .....
 
Last edited:
Spawn said:
The Kooh i noor wasnt stolen was it??, so i guess it was given to you just like that eh?? rofl:p.
What riches did you steal??,....hmmm lets see all the crown jewels that belong to the Queen at one time belonged to someone else, which were then taken forcefully by you and given to the Queen...Tell me what you havent stolen from other lands or people exactly??.



Why should he??, maybe he was born here so has just as much right as you do being here??. Nice to know that if us immigrants have an issue or issues and we air them, we are then told to go back home...

i was born here

Ranjit Singh crowned himself as the ruler of Punjab and willed the Koh-i-noor to Jagannath Temple in Orissa while on his deathbed in 1839. But there was dispute about this last-minute testament, and in any case it was not executed. On March 29, 1849, the British flag was hoisted on the citadel of Lahore and the Punjab was formally proclaimed to be part of the British Empire in India. One of the terms of the Treaty of Lahore, the legal agreement formalising this occupation, was as follows:

The gem called the Koh-I-Noor which was taken from Shah Shuja-ul-Mulk by Maharajah Ranjit Singh shall be surrendered by the Maharajah of Lahore to the Queen of England. The Governor-General in charge for the ratification of this treaty was Lord Dalhousie. More than anyone, Dalhousie was responsible for the British acquiring the Koh-i-Noor, in which he continued to show great interest for the rest of his life. Dalhousie's work in India was sometimes controversial, and his acquisition of the diamond, amongst many other things, was criticised by some contemporary British commentator.

all taken from wikipedia, it was surrendered to the british along with all of india's riches when britain invaded it, britain stole billions of pounds worth of diamonds, gold, silver, emeralds, jewels from india during their reign
 
VIRII said:
Pretty much everything ever attributed to Islam was stolen or the "spoils od war and conquest". What double standards you operate. When Islam forces its way around the world by the sword you prefer to forget about that and brush it off.

THe poster was told that if he hated the UK so much to leave. Problem with that?

errrrrrrr im a sikh and if you knew anything sikhs have hated muslims for the past 400 years because muslims raped our country, killed our people and forced them to convert to islam, after going through all of that britain decided it was their go and they stole all our money
 
Psycho Sonny said:
i was born here

Ranjit Singh crowned himself as the ruler of Punjab and willed the Koh-i-noor to Jagannath Temple in Orissa while on his deathbed in 1839. But there was dispute about this last-minute testament, and in any case it was not executed. On March 29, 1849, the British flag was hoisted on the citadel of Lahore and the Punjab was formally proclaimed to be part of the British Empire in India. One of the terms of the Treaty of Lahore, the legal agreement formalising this occupation, was as follows:

The gem called the Koh-I-Noor which was taken from Shah Shuja-ul-Mulk by Maharajah Ranjit Singh shall be surrendered by the Maharajah of Lahore to the Queen of England. The Governor-General in charge for the ratification of this treaty was Lord Dalhousie. More than anyone, Dalhousie was responsible for the British acquiring the Koh-i-Noor, in which he continued to show great interest for the rest of his life. Dalhousie's work in India was sometimes controversial, and his acquisition of the diamond, amongst many other things, was criticised by some contemporary British commentator.

all taken from wikipedia, it was surrendered to the british along with all of india's riches when britain invaded it, britain stole billions of pounds worth of diamonds, gold, silver, emeralds, jewels from india during their reign

The stones history goes back another 400 years and is the subject of lots of fighting and wars. SO who does it really belong to then ...... the man who mined it?
 
Psycho Sonny said:
errrrrrrr im a sikh and if you knew anything sikhs have hated muslims for the past 400 years because muslims raped our country, killed our people and forced them to convert to islam, after going through all of that britain decided it was their go and they stole all our money


Shhhh muslims never do that sort of thing.
 
VIRII said:
Pretty much everything ever attributed to Islam was stolen or the "spoils od war and conquest". What double standards you operate. When Islam forces its way around the world by the sword you prefer to forget about that and brush it off.

THe poster was told that if he hated the UK so much to leave. Problem with that?

So who exactly does the Koh I Noor "belong" to ?http://www.answers.com/topic/koh-i-noor

It seems every owner it has had has taken it in war .....


ROFL...i cant even begin to answer such an ill informed rant...tell you this though i am thoroughly enjoying your rant though. Double standards eh??, hmmm its fine for you lot to operate your double standards but when it comes to muslims its not ok...how hypocritical of you..shame on you.

Islam forces its way around the world by way of the sword, oh dear you really are mis informed arent you??. You havent a clue on what islam is really about even though you have been told to go and research it and even given links to help you along. I guess being ignorant must be appealing to you...
 
VIRII said:
The stones history goes back another 400 years and is the subject of lots of fighting and wars. SO who does it really belong to then ...... the man who mined it?

it was mined in india, it has an indian name, it was stolen from an indian, who do you think should keep it, the queen or the indian govt to help build its economy that has been raped by muslims and the british
 
Psycho Sonny said:
errrrrrrr im a sikh and if you knew anything sikhs have hated muslims for the past 400 years because muslims raped our country, killed our people and forced them to convert to islam, after going through all of that britain decided it was their go and they stole all our money


LOL i was waiting for someone to bring that up, we muslims could say the same thing about you sikhs as well but i wont bring it up now as it has no place here.
But i dont hate sikhs, i have plenty of sikh mates who respect me as a muslim and shock horror some of them of their own accord have become muslims and very good ones at that;).
 
Spawn said:
ROFL...i cant even begin to answer such an ill informed rant...tell you this though i am thoroughly enjoying your rant though. Double standards eh??, hmmm its fine for you lot to operate your double standards but when it comes to muslims its not ok...how hypocritical of you..shame on you.

Islam forces its way around the world by way of the sword, oh dear you really are mis informed arent you??. You havent a clue on what islam is really about even though you have been told to go and research it and even given links to help you along. I guess being ignorant must be appealing to you...

Ask sonny lol. He clearly thinks muslims are conquistadors.
What is uniformed in my post? Did Islam not "seek out knowledge and return it to" mecca or medina? Was it not a commandment to travel the world gaining riches and knowledge any way possible?
 
Spawn said:
LOL i was waiting for someone to bring that up, we muslims could say the same thing about you sikhs as well but i wont bring it up now as it has no place here.
But i dont hate sikhs, i have plenty of sikh mates who respect me as a muslim and shock horror some of them of their own accord have become muslims and very good ones at that;).

LOL. We'll just ignore what muslims did to Sikhs then because it doesn't fit your argument that Islam is not about conquest and conversion by the sword...
 
Psycho Sonny said:
it was mined in india, it has an indian name, it was stolen from an indian, who do you think should keep it, the queen or the indian govt to help build its economy that has been raped by muslims and the british

The queen. Shame we did not leave India alone and allow the hordes of petty princes to continue to wage wars that benefitted not the people but only the princes.
Without British intervention India would be even less of a world power than it is now, if it wasn't for Indias utter lack of unity and penchant for infighting they could have been quite something. Best blame others for your failings though.
 
Spawn said:
ROFL...i cant even begin to answer such an ill informed rant...tell you this though i am thoroughly enjoying your rant though. Double standards eh??, hmmm its fine for you lot to operate your double standards but when it comes to muslims its not ok...how hypocritical of you..shame on you.

Islam forces its way around the world by way of the sword, oh dear you really are mis informed arent you??. You havent a clue on what islam is really about even though you have been told to go and research it and even given links to help you along. I guess being ignorant must be appealing to you...

sikhism was invented roughly 400-500 years ago, at this time there was afghanistan - indian border (pakistan was invented by the british for all the indians forcefully converted to islam). what happened at this time was india had only 1 religion hinduism, afghanistan had 1 religion islam, the afghanistan emperor summoned his armies to invade india, after invading india, he told everyone you must convert to islam or you will be killed, people converted others didnt, so then again the emeperor said if anyone doesnt convert to islam kill their children, after seeing their children killed some people converted others didnt, then the emeperor said kill their mothers and wives, some converted and others died with their wives and mothers. their was an uprising, sikhism was invented to kill all the muslims and get them out of india, the sikhs grew strong and defeated the muslims, but this all took place over a long time im talking decades not a 6 month war, by this time india was left with 3 religions from its original one ( hindu's, sikh's and muslims). thats why hindu's and sikhs are best friends but they both hate muslims, it is written in the quran that their are 2 types of people the believer and the non believer, you must make the non believer a believer or kill them, this idea is re-inforced in the quran many times, it is a religion of war not peace. they opress women and non believers, when the british came along into india the muslim converts made a deal with the british because they were hated in india for converting that they wanted their own land, so they made some of the british special lords and britain gave them their own land (pakistan)
 
VIRII said:
LOL. We'll just ignore what muslims did to Sikhs then because it doesn't fit your argument that Islam is not about conquest and conversion by the sword...


Ahhh Virii your getting good at putting words into my mouth arent you??;) well done \o/...

Your right Islam isnt about conquest and conversion by the sword unless you want to dig up past history...tell me or give me some proof that its being spread by the way of the sword and im not talking about the hostages from a yr ago or so because they werent converted or forced to convert to islam. As for the sikhs well they werent exactly angels but then Sonny wouldnt know that as hes invariably heard the story from one side...whereas ive heard it from both sides so i would say im better informed to give an opinion. But anyways lets not go too OT as it wouldnt be fair...

As i said if ignorance appeals to you then fine by me, i wont make any opinions on things i dont know or havent researched.
 
Psycho Sonny said:


Dude i dont mean to be offensive etc but i dont need to know this as i already know it;)...but thanks for trying to educate me on the history of muslims/sikhs though but i know it anyways.
 
Spawn said:
Ahhh Virii your getting good at putting words into my mouth arent you??;) well done \o/...

Your right Islam isnt about conquest and conversion by the sword unless you want to dig up past history...tell me or give me some proof that its being spread by the way of the sword and im not talking about the hostages from a yr ago or so because they werent converted or forced to convert to islam. As for the sikhs well they werent exactly angels but then Sonny wouldnt know that as hes invariably heard the story from one side...whereas ive heard it from both sides so i would say im better informed to give an opinion. But anyways lets not go too OT as it wouldnt be fair...

As i said if ignorance appeals to you then fine by me, i wont make any opinions on things i dont know or havent researched.

yeh the sikhs killed muslims that had been killing their sons, daughters and wives and forcing them to convert to islam yes? islam is a cult - you have to pray 5 times a day - you have to wear a veil - you have to kill all non believers or make them into a believer - islam is the biggest plague on this planet - you are allowed to have 5 wives - you can divorce a wife with 1 word but cshe cannot do the same to you - it is traditional to marry your first cousin
 
Spawn said:
Dude i dont mean to be offensive etc but i dont need to know this as i already know it;)...but thanks for trying to educate me on the history of muslims/sikhs though but i know it anyways.

so your proud of the fact that your religion has murdered so many innocents all for allah?
 
Psycho Sonny said:
so your proud of the fact that your religion has murdered so many innocents all for allah?

I could very well say the same about your religion couldnt i?? but i wont because its a childish attitude and one i wont partake in.
But please point out or show me where i have shown proudness at the fact that islam supposedly murdered many innocents all for allah...I'll just point out that if islam did murder people for allah then it must have been provoked and we all know what happens when your provoke something to such an extent that it has no choice but to retaliate back. So those many innocents were not killed in vain but killed...perhaps in self defence as they were attacking innocent muslims??. Funny how people seem to forget that there are many innocent muslims that go about their daily lives but yet still get killed...for being a muslim...;)
 
No it was not the religion that killed, but the people that killed ... killing in the name of religion?! OMFGXRoRsxordy/dxcos-1sinh(x^2)ss!?!?! It can't be!!!!!!!!

BTW, go learn arabic and read the Quran for yourself before taking completely out of context quotes from anti-islamic websites and then using this as your idea of fact.

Any idiot can get a holy scripture and quote it out of context to fit their beliefs. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom