Have you made sure it is set to "quality" and also what res. is your native monitor set to?
I never lower the resolution on my monitor even if it meant awful fps purely because of how terrible it looked and that's because of how **** monitors are for scaling (no problems doing this on my TV as even 1080P looks bloody good) but DLSS 2.0 is fantastic on a **** LCD monitor.
Either way, I completely agree with wunkley, it only seems to be people who have never used DLSS or are AMD loyal that diss DLSS 2.0... If the fundamental tech. wasn't impressive, I don't think AMD and Microsoft would also be working on the exact same thing.... Plus I think every tech entity on youtube in the know rate DLSS 2.0 as being a superb feature and have gone into in depth analysis to back up these claims rather than some one liners on a random forum with no proof to show/explain why it is just "lowering resolution"....
Thankfully all the games I have/intend to play have DLSS 2.0, 150 hours in cyberpunk, just waiting on the next patch to finish my second play throughCurrently playing control now. Pretty hyped for dying light 2 (expecting it to be a mess on release though....)
I'm not a big fan of DLSS but anyone dismissing it as "just upscaling" has never played games which properly implement DLSS 2.0. Personally I will only accept it as a compromise if it facilitates implementing advanced RT effects.