Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2012
- Posts
- 4,548
- Location
- S.E Wales
Nope, don't mess them at all, horrible hideous bulky things.
CRT now is only good for old DOS games.
Nope, I don't think CRTs had great quality and I love my 42" monitor, thanks.
My crt is slightly fuzzy and has some minor burn in, but the reason I still use it is that if I was to go for a 24" monitor, trying to get a monitor that has no input lag, no ghosting, perfect viewing angles, no dead pixels, great blacks and good colours is very expensive.
I don't usually keep up too much with monitor tech, but most of it still seems you can get panels with great colours and blacks which are fantastic for movies, or panels for gaming with no ghosting or input lag, but suffers with colours or other stuff. And nearly no monitor has a 0 dead pixel policy, and I just wouldn't want to have to put up spending £400+ on a decent 24" that has dead pixels.
120hz better then crt so not really
Just dug your old monitor out of storage?
I never had any high end CRT's but those that did was the screen flat? I'll always remember CRT's as fishbowls. Plus half your desk or corner of the room taken.
Despite the heat, power and size - yes. Kinda sad they didn't keep a niche market but I guess the production costs would have negated any profit.
http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=952788
GDM-FW900 thread still going on nearly 6 years later...
I miss my FW900. It was fantastic.
god no, CRT's give me a headache now after using TFT screens!
Some CRT were quality flat screens yes very nice, they just cost a lot too. Im with Dist, Im waiting for holographic projectioncant be long now
![]()