-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Anything after Core 2 is faster than AMD FX by a long shot (gaming)
- Thread starter kipps90
- Start date
- Status
ban incoming regardless..
Last edited:
No the fact of the matter is you don't make any sense and are now playing the victim and dishing out insults.
Where you argument (though I'm still not sure what that is exactly) falls down is when you add the word budget to X58, and then try to justify the budget performance (£15 CPU) with a £400-500 graphics card, £100-200 motherboard and 1920x1080 monitor.
Like I said, are you saying people should run out an buy X58 boards and i7's along with GTX1070's to play Battlefield 1 at 1920x1080? If you are then I think thats crackers and would urge everyone to ignore you.
Do you game at 800x600? explains the idiocy.
Video evidence all over the place in this thread and yet you still can't establish a connection with actual logic.
Evidence of what?
If you're bottlenecked then you're bottlenecked. If you are intentionality bottlenecked then you doing it wrong
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 20,918
- Location
- Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
Its like these guys are robotically groomed and come into the forum every 6 months. Even the old gem of a "i3 beatz da FX in single thread" garbage has done the rounds is back!
As they say though, dont feed the troll. Just use the report post button and hope mods can clean up.
As they say though, dont feed the troll. Just use the report post button and hope mods can clean up.
Deleted member 651465
Deleted member 651465
and nothing of good came of this thread. RIP.
- Status