The Mac Pro was specifically designed as a workstation, that is a device for an end user either as an individual or within a corporation.
Its not going to see much in the way of corporation use though.
The Mac Pro was specifically designed as a workstation, that is a device for an end user either as an individual or within a corporation.
What do Macs in server rooms do any more? The last time I saw it was when the Xserve was still a thing and it was running InDesign Server because the developer on the project wanted to use a Mac.
They are used extensively still in film and television post-production.
Fair enough. I thought that task generally went to racks full of multi-CPU boxes running Linux/Windows as most of the heavy-lifting software is cross-platform. I wasn't aware people were still tying to build clusters of Macs.
Will be surprised if we do to be honest. Think this is it until late next year.
Keep your rolleyes to yourself. It doesn't matter how many times you've written it, the Mac Pro lying down is wider than a 19" rack.
Sorry, by existing I meant the aluminium tower versions.
Mac Pro is not sold on European market since 18 February due to non compliance with EU safety guidelines. We would kill at work for more 12 core MP's. I know of at least two new boutique outfits since then that had to go PC just because they couldn't get new MP's and they are absolutely screwed using Mac Minis to do exports to ProRes.
Bolting them to a shelf is stretching the definition of 'rack mounting' severely since it gives you terrible density.
It was a reply to what do people do with all the cards and kit they have, presumably they are already in an existing Mac Pro. Nobody bought a load of expansion cards and then waited months for the Mac Pro to be available with the hope it would be able to take them.
Tantrum all you want on technicalities hun, at the end of the day - in a rack, fits, been used in racks of studios, editing suits and broadcast rooms for years.
End of the road for upgradability. That's the problem we are discussing. "Stay on old workstation" is not an answer to the problem.
Tantrum all you want on technicalities hun, at the end of the day - in a rack, fits, been used in racks of studios, editing suits and broadcast rooms for years.
I can only think they bought too many iPad 2 components and they haven't sold through yet.
You need to move on and let it go. You've been whinging about Mac Pro's since June. Sure you can continue to do so. But it wont achieve anything. And theres little point in trying to force other people to agree with your POV.
Caged said:Did you cry about the same issue when the G5s moved away from PCI-X?
That's all well and good lads, but what I want to know is does a Mac Pro fit in a 19" rack lying down?
I reckon there might be something around March time, giving the iPad the Air branding for me means that will be the lighter version, otherwise no need to change the branding. If you look at their other lines, does follow a similar theme:
Mac mini, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro
iPad mini, iPad Air, ???
I'm guessing the Pro version might be something to compete with the Surface pro line rather than replacing the current iPad. Have been rumours of a cover with a keyboard and larger version.
No, PCI-X was not really that popular, widely adopted or long lived. PCI-e is a door to "beyond". It means compatibility. It means standardisation. It means I can have CUDA from secondary nvidia card, or USB 3, or eSATA stack, or use Mac Pro as a rendering or gaming rig with dual boot without Apple technically supporting or acknowledging existence of such devices.