Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,341
- Location
- Planet Earth
Yet apple fanatics argue big bad Microsoft are still the axis of evil.
Its Google I thought??
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/tongue.gif)
Yet apple fanatics argue big bad Microsoft are still the axis of evil.
I tend to find the people that are the most vocal against patents and copyright are the ones that have never invented anything worth protecting themselves.. :/
No-one is saying they don't own the patent. We are talking about fair.
a) Companies should pay the person that invented pinch to zoom to use it.
b) Companies should pay the pinch to zoom patent holder to use it.
IF the pinch to zoom inventer isn't the patent holder, then statement b isn't fair. IF.
Read the thread, read the patents, read the licensing to Ms, apples praise for nokia etc.
It is not like you say.
They won and when you actually sit down and read about the analysis, they where always going to win the amount they where. As samsung where blatantly using apples patents.
If those patents should have existed, is another question. But while patent laws stands as it is, then that's the law.
Will I have been following this trail for a long time, and it seemed rather even. Samsung did copy, but they made a good case of showing that the pinch to zoom, tap to zoom should be made invalid with the prior art, everyone was sure it would have gone in Samsung favour for that.
Like apple haven't ripped off other peoples ideas and designs including Samsungs, double standards come to mind.
Apple = Innovate
Everyone else = Imitate
Great Court Ruling, Maybe it's time Korean companies stop stealing ideas and come up with their own shizzle!
I am an E71 user do no fanboi comments
Apple = Innovate
Everyone else = Imitate
Apple = Innovate
Everyone else = Imitate
Great Court Ruling, Maybe it's time Korean companies stop stealing ideas and come up with their own shizzle!
I am an E71 user do no fanboi comments
I wonder how much this decision was about keeping Apple stocks inflated? Apple didn't sue Samsung because of the principle of the matter, but because they were cutting in to iphone sales very badly.
Cutting into what sales, apple sales have been increasing year on year.