Personally I don't like the Arctic Monkeys. Like The Zutons, Babyshambles, etc. etc. they use a 'jangling' clean tone on their guitars for nigh on every single song that frankly gets right on my ****. I won't deny there is musical talent there (I quite like The Zutons, think they have a lot in them and a lot of potential for the future.)
The singers singing 'accent' from Arctic Monkeys irritates me too...
This whole thread, albeit using Arctic Monkeys as the regular scapegoat, is just becoming about the dire state of
popular music today, and just how much the media influences it.
The state of the music industry has never been bette, in my opinion. Never before have we had such quality and diversity of music being produced. The cost of professional quality recording has plumeted, and most people can afford to knock up a professional album using their home PC, and then sell it underground or however.
The whole scenario is a marketing nightmare, but a muso's delight.
Unfortunately popular culture is not and has never been a 'muso'. Its not interested in quality, more in the unusual or quirky, or whatever reflects the current culture the most. Its the easiest stuff to advertise and brings in a guaranteed money.
Award ceremonies are often a reflection of popular culture, with only a few like the Mercury Award occasionally swimming against the flow. The Mercury prize has slowly changed to reflect 'pop' these days. An example of how it used to be: Back in '96 Courtney Pine received a Mercury nomination for his Jazz album 'Modern Day Jazz Stories', alongside acts like Pulp, Oasis, Norma Waterson, Underworld, and even Sir Peter Maxwell Davies.
I can still fondly remember how annoyed Steps were when the relatively unknown (in popular culture) Belle & Sebastion beat them to an award at the Brits. Guess who's still around making and selling albums with as strong a following as ever
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c52ff/c52ff17eea75f5fa374792d68c3cb4c06c406d96" alt="Wink ;) ;)"