Are Mens Sock Garters Wrong?
- Thread starter Ice Tea
- Start date
Is it not obvious that he lifted up the leg of his jeans to show us what he had won to give us a laugh?
Though if i had known i would have looked away.
1) Yes
2) No
3) Embrace Cross-Dressing
A friend won some sock garters in a Christmas raffle and they looked like the funniest thing ever with his jeans , something about it was just wrong...
I'd go with 4) Pointless and silly, but I don't care.
I suppose they might be useful if you wore really long socks without any internal means of staying up, like some kind of re-enactment style medieval hose.
LOL
Hmm...maybe the inevitable feeling of some degree of restriction of movement appeals to some people who are into bondage.
i use the one that attaches to your shirt to keep it tucked in, my shirt was forever falling out when i get in and out the van and picking stuff up from the floor and tucking it back in 40+ times a day was doing my head in, i don't feel restricted wearing them in fact i forget they are even on
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2008
- Posts
- 6,062
Might find it quite sexual. She's taking her stocking and suspenders off while the guy is taking his socks and garters off, while both are gawping at each other. Could have a race to see who finishes undressing first tooI am a old codger and I have never ever seem shirt braces that connect to socks - Must be a modern invention as us men in them days were masculine -
Imagine undressing in front of a new bird you have picked up and had them on.
.Imagine wearing socks and garters without underwear
. Now there's a strange thought.
Last edited:
Permabanned
- Joined
- 13 Apr 2017
- Posts
- 969
- Location
- scotland
Indeedy, Like flip-flops, no man should ever be seen wearing such girly footwear.
It's a variation on a very old invention. Centuries ago, clothing worn on your legs was connected to clothing worn on your torso. It's why we refer to a pair of trousers, etc, despite them being 1 item and therefore not a pair. Centuries ago, they were a pair and each leg was held up by being tied to your torso clothing or a belt. This is just a sillier and obsolete version of that. It's like replacing your car with a mechanical horse.
Oh, I think it's acceptable.
I think it's very silly, but completely acceptable because it does no harm. That's my rule of thumb for what's acceptable.
They look utterly ridiculous, HOWEVER, as one of the posters above mentioned, what in reality other than the sheer ludicrous look of these, would be available to prevent the shirt untuck issue? I realise dress shirts are generally much longer, so perhaps this is a sort of alternative.
Maybe someone needs to invent some sort of almost invisible device which clips to the bottom of the shirt, then bends up and clips to your belt?
Maybe someone needs to invent some sort of almost invisible device which clips to the bottom of the shirt, then bends up and clips to your belt?
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,527
it wasn't obvious. anyway they are a bizarre invention , a good pair of socks will stay up on their ownIs it not obvious that he lifted up the leg of his jeans to show us what he had won to give us a laugh?
Though if i had known i would have looked away.
WTF! <headscratch>
So if your friend gets a new tattoo does he show you himself or do you undress him to look for it.
there's always these https://www.tuckedtrunks.com/ but $29 a pair
but in the time it takes messing about to get them off you probably poo yourself
Last edited: