• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Are Nvidia drivers really better than Amd's?

It all comes down, hilariously, to nothing but downright luck.

Some install a set of drivers and they immediately work and the card/s do exactly as they should. From that moment on they're sold. Some install them, get a never ending pile of crap and then people on forums saying they're stupid and it's user error and so on. At which point they then hate the product and the drivers. This stuff really does last.

I've only had problems with Nvidia drivers a couple of times. That's in all the years I have used them. I've never had a red screen, black screen or blue screen. Luck? as I said, yes, totally.

With AMD I've had nothing but aggro and when I have taken to forums to get help all I've got are brainwashed trolls telling me I can't install a bloody video driver lmao. Sure I can't.

The worst card I ever had was my 7970. I got artefacts randomly placed all over the desktop making it look like it was made of crystal, black hole monitor which basically turned half of the monitor into a black hole should I let the rig sleep and so on and so on. The issues just went on and on. It was also bloody hot and bloody loud too.

Go looking for help I get the trolls. PEBKAK yada ya. This sort of stuff doesn't exactly make me want to pull my fingernails out again.

Oddly the issues were actually down to AMD and their early 3D tridef rubbish. The monitor I had simply perplexed the GPU and that's why I had so many issues. None of course were my fault, simply down to bad drivers.

And the same was true before that with my 5770s. Every single last moment that I breathed with those things they were nothing but trouble. But again, "Fine here !" "No problems here it's you" and so on. Honestly how can people be that bloody blind? Crossfire clearly did not work properly, how could they not even notice? pmsl.

When Crossfire was exposed I finally got my answers. However, what I didn't understand was how so many people could have suffered these issues without even noticing it. It wasn't hard ! it stuttered like a pig.

So to answer the thread title ONCE AGAIN (seriously can the trolls leave off after this I'm getting tired of saying the same thing over and over) I prefer Nvidia drivers and I've given my reasons why once and for all.

I don't like being accused of being at fault when really it's just poor software. On the flip side? well the bad driver in 2010 killed my GTX 280 but it was under warranty so Nvidia would have ended up supplying the replacement. Other than that? it's been plain sailing.

I did have issues with a 64mb Geforce 4 MX back in 2001 but that turned out to be bad VRAM.

Nvidia have spent good money and time on SLI. Their cards even have hardware built in to help along eradicating frame drops and runt frames so that's where my money has always gone.

However, they (Nvidia) are certainly not in my favour right now. I am looking to jump ship back to AMD (I must want my head examining) but they are going to have to offer the right product at the right price and be able to out do three Titan Blacks with two of their new cards.

If so? well I'll just come on here and shoot the crap with Matt to get them running properly.
 
Even so, my worst experience for NVIDIA drivers were always with my old GTX 470, often giving my BSODs.

Have to say I ran 470 SLI and another system with a single 470 and never had a single BSOD the whole time - only real issue I remember were the 320.18 drivers but fortunately I skipped those.
 
Have to say I ran 470 SLI and another system with a single 470 and never had a single BSOD the whole time - only real issue I remember were the 320.18 drivers but fortunately I skipped those.

My 470 was one of the best cards I've ever owned. Now granted I threw one of those Zalman V3000F on it but yeah, absolutely gorgeous card and always worked amazingly until BF3 came along and made it stutter. Gutted, I was only 200mb short :(



I replaced it with a 6970 Lightning which worked OK and all good drivers but the card itself died :(
 
Lack of VRAM was the only reason I upgraded from the 470 SLI and would probably be on them until nVidia's 16nm FF or lower cards otherwise, though some stutter in BF4 and multi GPU didn't help - even if it was an engine specific problem and could be worked around at the loss of 5% performance.
 
Lack of VRAM was the only reason I upgraded from the 470 SLI and would probably be on them until nVidia's 16nm FF or lower cards otherwise, though some stutter in BF4 and multi GPU didn't help - even if it was an engine specific problem and could be worked around at the loss of 5% performance.

The 470 didn't have enough VRAM for BF3 and certainly BF4. Nvidia specified 1.5gb for ultra settings or you get input lag.

Shame. I had my 470 for absolutely ages and was really happy with it. The next few months were a nightmare tbh. I went to a 6970L that was dud, then a 7970 that was nightmares then I swapped the 7970 for two GTX 480s and karma was once again restored :)
 
One of the gents on here has multiple computers, so that if one combo (of components) is bad, usually the other is good. Not really the best financial option but it is one approach to getting around driver issues in the short term.

Personally, Ihave found nvidia stuff to just work, whilst AND often needed some faffing. I have never had a complaint about performance, if i thought something was lacking I upgraded or found a work around.

i am happy with either company personally.
 
*snip*
Personally, Ihave found nvidia stuff to just work, whilst AND often needed some faffing. I have never had a complaint about performance, if i thought something was lacking I upgraded or found a work around.

i am happy with either company personally.

I dont care about "faffing" :) as long as there is a workable solution. Now i use nVidia myself atm and has been happy with the performance and also drivers as long as i steer clear of Geforce Experience. Its been the same when i had AMD been pretty happy as long as i didnt install Raptr that PoC. I guess i feel the same way as you regarding your last bolded statement :) in regards to drivers.
 
One of the gents on here has multiple computers, so that if one combo (of components) is bad, usually the other is good. Not really the best financial option but it is one approach to getting around driver issues in the short term.

Personally, Ihave found nvidia stuff to just work, whilst AND often needed some faffing. I have never had a complaint about performance, if i thought something was lacking I upgraded or found a work around.

i am happy with either company personally.

The 290 experience for me was bloody good. I bought one to use in my other rig with An.other OS (can't mention it for legal reasons) and in Windows it was fantastic. I run Titan Black SLI but I tell you the 290 really impressed me and the drivers were excellent.

I've heard good things about the 295x2. Even Bit tech who are known multi GPU haters gave it a sterling review.

I just hope I can get their new ones working OK.
 
I dont care about "faffing" :) as long as there is a workable solution. Now i use nVidia myself atm and has been happy with the performance and also drivers as long as i steer clear of Geforce Experience. Its been the same when i had AMD been pretty happy as long as i didnt install Raptr that PoC. I guess i feel the same way as you regarding your last bolded statement :) in regards to drivers.

It is great that we all differ (boring world if we didn't). I personally don't have an issue with GE but wouldn't have it there if not for ShadowPlay. I did the same with Raptr but the way it hogs resources and GVR only works in a limited number of games lets it down. ShaodwPlay was great but it basically rendered my third Titan as useless and I got the same frames with 2 Titans and Shadowplay as I did with 3 Titans and ShadowPlay. If they could streamline Raptr a bit and get more out of GVR, that would be a biggie for AMD for me.
 
As far as single cards go, I've never had a problem with AMD or nvidia. I can't comment on sli as I've never had it, but when I had a 4870x2 I no problems with crossfire either.
 
My own experience with AMD drivers is very limited but I always seem to find that my friends with AMD cards have to wait longer for drivers, profiles and fixes then I have to with NVidia.

Quality difference on drivers may be minimal to non-existent but the reliability of the company to release them is massive it seems.

NVidia can screw up a driver, release a hotfix then actually release a real fix before AMD realise there's a new game out.
 
As far as single cards go, I've never had a problem with AMD or nvidia. I can't comment on sli as I've never had it, but when I had a 4870x2 I no problems with crossfire either.

You did have problems with Crossfire you're just not sensitive enough to have noticed it.

Crossfire never worked properly until 2013, that card came out long before that.
 
The last time I went to Nvidia was with the 670 and was expecting by the hype on the internet about their drivers that they were bug free but that turned out to be not true as there was glitching in Tomb Raider at the time which took them a while to fix.

What I also noticed immediately was the dullness of the color's and image was not as sharp even though certain people where saying Nvidia and Amd had the same image quality. Cranking up the digital vibrance helped but I have always seen Amd's image quality to be better.

Yep people told the truth both Nvidia and AMD had same image quality, that why games sites stopped compared games image quality years ago.

There are lots of games image quality compared on both Nvidia and AMD side by side on youtube so you will find all games image quality looked same.

I found Tomb Raider image quality comparison on Nvidia and AMD.

 
Yep people told the truth both Nvidia and AMD had same image quality, that why games sites stopped compared games image quality years ago.

There are lots of games image quality compared on both Nvidia and AMD side by side on youtube so you will find all games image quality looked same.

I found Tomb Raider image quality comparison on Nvidia and AMD.


Youtube does special encoding and quality varies dramatically. You would need to either have the original format or preferably see it in person for yourself.

Even on the web most images aren't the originals quality wise (they are usually downscaled for quicker viewing speeds)
 
It looks more vibrant on the 670 to me. Deeper colours, especially on the reds. Youtube doesn't help though in terms of quality.

 
Last edited:
+1 but just like to point out that Gsync also did not work with multi GPU when it first came out either and that's NVs own custom tech.

People have a staggeringly short memory at times or just not aware of what happened in the past and can only see the now in which Gsync works with Multi GPU and Freesync does not and comment as if thing were not like this for Gsync when in fact it was and they had to pay a premium for the privilege.

yeah but tbh they've already paid a premium twice by paying for nvidia gpus so they clearly don't mind spending teh money.


Back on topic

I have been using a 290 since the 970 came out (I sold my 780ti just before launch. Nothing wrong with it and with the exception to colouration issues in dying light (which i suspect are local to my card as no one else has described them anywhere) I've had no problems in any game I've played nvidia game works or AMD gaming evolved.

I hate the 3rd party raptr software i think it's flawed and because AMD aren't 100% responsible for it I doubt it will ever be fixed 100%.

It simply put doesn't work as well as nvidias experience. And I've had 0 blue screens since i removed it.


that said with exception to having to wait for freesync drivers there has been nothing wrong with the driver


I still hate the catalyst centre it makes no sense how it's laid out and i wish all the settings i wanted to play with were on the same damned page but little things once it's set up i never re-open it.




Both companies have problems with games on launch and yes Nvidia seem to react quicker.
 
Yep people told the truth both Nvidia and AMD had same image quality, that why games sites stopped compared games image quality years ago.

There are lots of games image quality compared on both Nvidia and AMD side by side on youtube so you will find all games image quality looked same.

My eyes tell me different. Only have to swap a Nvidia card with a Amd card and immediately I see the difference. Others have noticed it as well but obviously not all people see it even though it's obvious. Amd is always more vibrant in colors and sharper out of the box.
 
Back
Top Bottom