If I paid £7500 for a power lead, I think I'd convince myself the sound quality had increased dramamtically as well.
lol
If I paid £7500 for a power lead, I think I'd convince myself the sound quality had increased dramamtically as well.
PROPAGATION: 86% the speed of light
Golden Goose way or just an opening ceremony?To justify the price this cable would have to be laid by the queen herself.
One hopes that no-one who takes exception to this has spent over £1000 on a watch
heh, I was thinking the same thing while reading the thread (although I'd lower that figure to around £100).
Thankfully some of us have charm and taste.Thing is an expensive Rolex watch carries some real status in the world and also attract the attention of the oppoesite sex.
Thankfully some of us have charm and taste.
I'm going to play devil's advocate -
Yes it is silly money, and it won't directly improve the quality of your sound - but if you were building a top-end digital recording studio and wanted shielded cables that didn't detract from the quality of inputs / outputs from other equipment, might you consider these?
Ok the answer is probably still no but
Forget scientific explanation, blind tests are the only way to actually prove any of this.I like the way the pretentious knob from the Hifi mag says it's done wonders for his system and brought about world peace etc etc... Is there a review that backs this up with scientific analysis, spectrum analyser results and the like rather than just what some foppish, effusive, corrupt reviewer says?
Forget scientific explanation, blind tests are the only way to actually prove any of this.
I like the way the pretentious knob from the Hifi mag says it's done wonders for his system and brought about world peace etc etc... Is there a review that backs this up with scientific analysis, spectrum analyser results and the like rather than just what some foppish, effusive, corrupt reviewer says?